Purdue

30-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

93.9%Purdue

6.1%Maryland

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -16.5

PROJECTED TOTAL150.6

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -1539

Maryland

12-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePurdue 84

Projected Total150.6

Projected ScoreMaryland 67

Team Comparison

PurdueMetricMaryland

73.2MMH Power Index44.1

124.8Offensive Efficiency104.5

107.8Defensive Efficiency113.6

17.0Net Efficiency-9.1

7.6Strength of Schedule5.2

11.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-9.7

65.4Tempo66.7

57.8%Effective FG%48.6%

13.7%Turnover Rate18.8%

36.2%Offensive Rebound %34.0%

29.1%Free Throw Rate38.9%

11.1Average Margin-6.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY93.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–44.1), offensive efficiency (124.8–104.5), defensive efficiency (107.8–113.6), net efficiency (17.0–-9.1).

Maryland COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (38.9–29.1).

Final

Purdue

67—53

Maryland

Purdue by 14 • 61.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PurdueTEAM STATMaryland

25-54FG21-63

46.3%FG%33.3%

9-203PT5-22

45.0%3PT%22.7%

8-10FT6-11

80.0%FT%54.5%

39Rebounds34

10Offensive Rebounds15

16Assists5

12Turnovers9

1Steals6

2Blocks3

7Fouls12

Player Box Score

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Zach Edey	Center	34	8-13	0-0	7-8	12	2	0	1	23
Braden Smith	G	35	6-13	2-3	0-0	7	6	1	0	14
Lance Jones	Guard	33	4-13	3-10	0-0	1	4	0	0	11
Fletcher Loyer	G	27	3-9	2-5	1-2	3	2	0	0	9
Mason Gillis	Forward	23	2-2	0-0	0-0	3	2	0	0	4
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	17	1-3	1-1	0-0	5	0	0	0	3
Camden Heide	F	10	1-1	1-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	3
Ethan Morton	Guard	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Caleb Furst	Forward	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Myles Colvin	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Maryland

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jahmir Young	Guard	35	12-23	2-6	0-3	4	0	1	0	26
Jordan Geronimo	Forward	23	3-10	0-2	3-4	6	0	0	1	9
Donta Scott	Forward	33	2-6	1-3	3-4	7	0	3	0	8
Jamie Kaiser Jr.	F	21	2-8	2-6	0-0	2	0	0	1	6
Jahari Long	G	23	1-4	0-1	0-0	1	2	0	0	2
DeShawn Harris-Smith	G	21	1-7	0-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Julian Reese	Forward	34	0-4	0-0	0-0	7	2	2	1	0
Caelum Swanton-Rodger	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Noah Batchelor	G	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.5Possessions61.5

108.9Offensive Efficiency86.2

86.2Defensive Efficiency108.9

22.8Net Efficiency-22.8

54.6%Effective FG%37.3%

57.0%True Shooting %38.8%

19.8%Turnover Rate14.5%

18.5%Free Throw Rate17.5%

37.0%3-Point Rate34.9%

1.33Assist / Turnover0.56

Game Summary

Purdue won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 61.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.