Nebraska

28-7

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

44.3%Nebraska

55.7%Wisconsin

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWisconsin -1.5

PROJECTED TOTAL153.2

MODEL MONEYLINEWisconsin -126

Wisconsin

24-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNebraska 76

Projected Total153.2

Projected ScoreWisconsin 77

Team Comparison

NebraskaMetricWisconsin

67MMH Power Index64.5

114.4Offensive Efficiency118.6

98.3Defensive Efficiency108.8

16.1Net Efficiency9.8

6.1Strength of Schedule6.7

6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency5.6

67.3Tempo69.9

55.6%Effective FG%54.6%

14.4%Turnover Rate12.8%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %28.7%

26.9%Free Throw Rate32.5%

10.8Average Margin6.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Nebraska HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY55.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNebraska holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.0–64.5), defensive efficiency (98.3–108.8), net efficiency (16.1–9.8), recent form (6.8–5.6).

Wisconsin COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.6–114.4), strength of schedule (6.7–6.1), ball security (12.8–14.4).

Final

Nebraska

72—88

Wisconsin

Wisconsin by 16 • 67.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NebraskaTEAM STATWisconsin

26-53FG33-60

49.1%FG%55.0%

12-263PT13-26

46.2%3PT%50.0%

8-11FT9-13

72.7%FT%69.2%

26Rebounds32

3Offensive Rebounds7

16Assists18

12Turnovers8

4Steals6

4Blocks—

16Fouls13

Player Box Score

Nebraska

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Keisei Tominaga	Guard	32	7-10	3-6	0-0	0	2	0	0	17
Rienk Mast	F	33	6-14	2-7	2-4	6	2	1	1	16
Brice Williams	Guard	32	3-9	1-3	3-3	4	6	0	0	10
Juwan Gary	Forward	18	4-5	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	1	8
CJ Wilcher	Guard	16	2-4	2-3	0-0	1	0	1	1	6
Sam Hoiberg	G	20	1-4	1-2	2-2	6	2	0	1	5
Josiah Allick	Forward	22	1-3	1-1	1-2	5	2	0	0	4
Jamarques Lawrence	G	17	1-3	1-2	0-0	2	0	1	0	3
Eli Rice	G	8	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	1	1	0	3
Matar Diop	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Cale Jacobsen	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Wisconsin

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Tyler Wahl	Forward	31	6-10	1-1	4-6	8	4	1	17
Chucky Hepburn	Guard	33	5-8	3-5	0-0	2	6	3	13
John Blackwell	G	19	5-8	1-2	1-1	3	0	0	12
Connor Essegian	G	12	4-9	4-7	0-0	1	0	0	12
AJ Storr	G	20	3-8	1-3	3-5	5	3	1	10
Steve Crowl	Forward	31	4-5	1-2	0-0	7	4	0	9
Nolan Winter	F	8	2-5	0-2	1-1	1	0	0	5
Kamari McGee	Guard	6	2-2	1-1	0-0	1	0	1	5
Max Klesmit	Guard	26	1-2	1-2	0-0	3	0	0	3
Carter Gilmore	Forward	7	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	2
Markus Ilver	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0
Isaac Lindsey	Guard	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0
Chris Hodges	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0
Isaac Gard	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0
Luke Haertle	G	1	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.2Possessions67.2

107.1Offensive Efficiency131.0

131.0Defensive Efficiency107.1

-23.8Net Efficiency23.8

60.4%Effective FG%65.8%

61.8%True Shooting %66.5%

17.9%Turnover Rate11.9%

20.8%Free Throw Rate21.7%

49.1%3-Point Rate43.3%

1.33Assist / Turnover2.25

Game Summary

Wisconsin won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 67.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.