
Nebraska
28-7GAME THAT MATTERSAT
78.9%Nebraska
21.1%Creighton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNebraska -8.2
PROJECTED TOTAL148.1
MODEL MONEYLINENebraska -374

Creighton
15-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNebraska 78
Projected Total148.1
Projected ScoreCreighton 70
Team Comparison
67MMH Power Index50.6
114.4Offensive Efficiency109.0
98.3Defensive Efficiency109.5
16.1Net Efficiency-0.5
6.1Strength of Schedule5.1
6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2
67.3Tempo68.9
55.6%Effective FG%53.0%
14.4%Turnover Rate16.6%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
26.9%Free Throw Rate29.0%
10.8Average Margin-0.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Nebraska HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNebraska holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.0–50.6), offensive efficiency (114.4–109.0), defensive efficiency (98.3–109.5), net efficiency (16.1–-0.5).
Creighton COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (26.6–26.3), free throw rate (29.0–26.9).