Kentucky

22-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

53.7%Kentucky

46.3%Texas A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -0.3

PROJECTED TOTAL158.2

MODEL MONEYLINEKentucky -116

Texas A&M

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreKentucky 79

Projected Total158.2

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 79

Team Comparison

KentuckyMetricTexas A&M

63.9MMH Power Index58

115.2Offensive Efficiency116.1

106.3Defensive Efficiency108.4

8.9Net Efficiency7.7

8.7Strength of Schedule4.8

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2

69.9Tempo69.1

53.2%Effective FG%53.5%

15.4%Turnover Rate14.8%

33.2%Offensive Rebound %31.7%

38.0%Free Throw Rate37.5%

6.2Average Margin5.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Kentucky HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKentucky holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–58.0), defensive efficiency (106.3–108.4), net efficiency (8.9–7.7), strength of schedule (8.7–4.8).

Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (116.1–115.2), shooting efficiency (53.5–53.2), ball security (14.8–15.4).

Final

Kentucky

92—97

Texas A&M

Texas A&M by 5 • 80.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

KentuckyTEAM STATTexas A&M

32-76FG33-82

42.0%FG%40.0%

15-393PT12-32

38.0%3PT%38.0%

13-21FT19-30

62.0%FT%63.0%

46Rebounds54

17Offensive Rebounds25

22Assists11

11Turnovers9

6Steals9

9Blocks7

21Fouls19

Player Box Score

Kentucky

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Antonio Reeves	Guard	31	7-15	5-10	3-4	6	1	0	1	22
DJ Wagner	G	31	7-15	1-5	3-5	2	4	1	0	18
Rob Dillingham	Guard	24	6-15	3-10	0-0	0	4	1	0	15
Reed Sheppard	Guard	33	3-5	3-5	4-6	6	3	3	1	13
Tre Mitchell	Center	44	3-13	1-6	1-2	13	6	0	1	8
Justin Edwards	Forward	22	3-6	2-2	0-0	4	1	1	1	8
Ugonna Onyenso	C	32	3-5	0-0	1-2	10	0	0	5	7
Jordan Burks	F	2	0-1	0-0	1-2	0	1	0	0	1
Aaron Bradshaw	F	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	2	0	0	0

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Wade Taylor IV	Guard	40	7-24	6-13	11-12	6	5	2	0	31
Tyrece Radford	Guard	39	11-22	3-6	3-9	9	4	0	0	28
Jace Carter	Not Available	22	4-9	1-4	0-2	5	0	0	1	9
Solomon Washington	F	25	3-5	1-2	0-0	9	0	2	2	7
Andersson Garcia	Forward	29	2-4	0-0	1-2	8	1	5	0	5
Manny Obaseki	Guard	11	2-4	0-2	1-1	1	1	0	0	5
Wildens Leveque	Forward	25	1-5	0-0	2-2	7	0	0	3	4
Henry Coleman III	Forward	22	2-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
Hayden Hefner	Guard	10	1-5	1-4	1-2	2	0	0	1	4
Eli Lawrence	Guard	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

80.2Possessions80.2

114.7Offensive Efficiency120.9

120.9Defensive Efficiency114.7

-6.2Net Efficiency6.2

52.0%Effective FG%47.6%

53.5%True Shooting %50.4%

13.8%Turnover Rate11.2%

27.6%Free Throw Rate36.6%

51.3%3-Point Rate39.0%

2.00Assist / Turnover1.22

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 80.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.