
Oklahoma
21-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
39.1%Oklahoma
60.9%Cincinnati
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCincinnati -4.3
PROJECTED TOTAL152.6
MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -156

Cincinnati
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreOklahoma 74
Projected Total152.6
Projected ScoreCincinnati 78
Team Comparison
62.1MMH Power Index61.5
119.5Offensive Efficiency105.3
111.6Defensive Efficiency97.3
7.9Net Efficiency8.0
3.2Strength of Schedule5.1
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4
69.4Tempo69.4
55.1%Effective FG%50.6%
14.4%Turnover Rate17.0%
32.4%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
36.2%Free Throw Rate30.7%
5.5Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Oklahoma HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMOklahoma holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.1–61.5), offensive efficiency (119.5–105.3), shooting efficiency (55.1–50.6), ball security (14.4–17.0).
Cincinnati COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (97.3–111.6), net efficiency (8.0–7.9), strength of schedule (5.1–3.2).