Dayton logo

Dayton

25-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
82.7%Dayton
17.3%La Salle
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDayton -9.3
PROJECTED TOTAL142.4
MODEL MONEYLINEDayton -478
La Salle logo

La Salle

9-23
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDayton 76
Projected Total142.4
Projected ScoreLa Salle 67

Team Comparison

59.9MMH Power Index41.3
108.5Offensive Efficiency100.8
101.5Defensive Efficiency111.3
7.0Net Efficiency-10.5
5.7Strength of Schedule4.6
6.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-13.9
68.3Tempo66.5
52.0%Effective FG%46.2%
16.9%Turnover Rate18.2%
26.7%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
47.6%Free Throw Rate38.3%
4.8Average Margin-7.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Dayton HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY82.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDayton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–41.3), offensive efficiency (108.5–100.8), defensive efficiency (101.5–111.3), net efficiency (7.0–-10.5).
La Salle COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.8–26.7).
Final
Dayton logo
Dayton
66—54
La Salle logo
La Salle
Dayton by 12 • 62.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

DaytonTEAM STATLa Salle
27-57FG21-59
47.4%FG%35.6%
5-193PT8-29
26.3%3PT%27.6%
7-8FT4-5
87.5%FT%80.0%
34Rebounds33
6Offensive Rebounds9
14Assists12
8Turnovers10
6Steals4
3Blocks2
11Fouls13

Player Box Score

Dayton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
DaRon Holmes IICenter349-161-33-384220022
Nate SantosForward396-120-41-160100013
Javon BennettG304-73-52-243000013
Kobe ElvisGuard324-111-41-244100010
Koby BreaGuard262-40-20-03110004
Enoch CheeksGuard301-50-10-03111002
Zimi NwokejiForward31-10-00-00100002
Isaac JackF60-10-00-00000000
La Salle
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Andrés MarreroG215-103-80-001000013
Jhamir BrickusGuard384-71-30-03320009
Khalil BrantleyGuard373-131-52-22600009
Daeshon ShepherdGuard282-121-71-27110006
Tunde Vahlberg FasasiF252-62-50-07001006
Anwar GillGuard182-40-01-11101005
Rokas JociusF142-50-10-06000004
Ryan ZanF191-20-00-05010002

Advanced Game Stats

62.6Possessions62.6
105.4Offensive Efficiency86.3
86.3Defensive Efficiency105.4
19.2Net Efficiency-19.2
51.8%Effective FG%42.4%
54.3%True Shooting %44.0%
12.7%Turnover Rate16.0%
14.0%Free Throw Rate8.5%
33.3%3-Point Rate49.2%
1.75Assist / Turnover1.20
Game Summary
Dayton won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 62.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.