Arkansas-Pine Bluff

13-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

4.5%Arkansas-Pine Bluff

95.5%Cincinnati

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCincinnati -20.3

PROJECTED TOTAL151.2

MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -2122

Cincinnati

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreArkansas-Pine Bluff 65

Projected Total151.2

Projected ScoreCincinnati 86

Team Comparison

Arkansas-Pine BluffMetricCincinnati

38.7MMH Power Index61.5

106.4Offensive Efficiency105.3

111.6Defensive Efficiency97.3

-5.2Net Efficiency8.0

-6.0Strength of Schedule5.1

1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4

72.6Tempo69.4

51.4%Effective FG%50.6%

18.5%Turnover Rate17.0%

29.3%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

37.7%Free Throw Rate30.7%

-3.8Average Margin5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–38.7), defensive efficiency (97.3–111.6), net efficiency (8.0–-5.2), strength of schedule (5.1–-6.0).

Arkansas-Pine Bluff COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (106.4–105.3), shooting efficiency (51.4–50.6), free throw rate (37.7–30.7).

Final

Arkansas-Pine Bluff

54—109

Cincinnati

Cincinnati by 55 • 74.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Arkansas-Pine BluffTEAM STATCincinnati

20-59FG42-72

33.9%FG%58.3%

5-193PT12-24

26.3%3PT%50.0%

9-14FT13-23

64.3%FT%56.5%

25Rebounds48

8Offensive Rebounds17

7Assists27

17Turnovers9

5Steals10

2Blocks7

20Fouls12

Player Box Score

Arkansas-Pine Bluff

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dante Sawyer	Guard	26	4-7	0-1	3-4	3	0	0	1	11
Caleb Jones	Guard	20	3-7	1-2	2-2	1	1	0	0	9
Christian Moore	Guard	25	3-16	1-4	0-0	1	3	3	0	7
Quentin Bolton	G	10	3-4	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Robert Lewis	F	24	2-5	1-3	0-0	5	1	1	1	5
Kyle Brown	F	17	2-6	1-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	5
Klemen Vuga	Forward	15	1-4	1-2	1-2	1	0	0	0	4
Dennis Asoro	F	12	2-3	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	4
Raphael Dumont	Guard	13	0-1	0-1	3-6	1	1	0	0	3
Zachary Reinhart	G	26	0-5	0-4	0-0	7	0	0	0	0
Chop Paljor	Guard	12	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Cincinnati

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Simas Lukosius	Guard	22	8-10	3-5	1-2	2	4	1	0	20
Dan Skillings Jr.	G	23	6-11	1-3	4-4	11	4	1	1	17
Connor Hickman	G	23	5-6	3-4	0-0	4	2	2	0	13
Jizzle James	G	26	5-12	1-3	1-3	7	10	1	0	12
Aziz Bandaogo	Forward	24	5-5	0-0	1-4	8	1	1	4	11
Dillon Mitchell	F	24	5-11	0-2	0-2	8	1	1	1	10
Arrinten Page	F	13	3-6	0-0	3-5	2	2	1	0	9
Rayvon Griffith	F	8	2-5	1-3	3-3	0	0	0	0	8
Tyler Betsey	F	14	2-4	2-3	0-0	4	1	1	1	6
CJ Fredrick Jr.	Guard	15	1-2	1-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Josh Reed	F	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	1	0	0
Halvine Dzellat	C	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

74.8Possessions74.8

72.2Offensive Efficiency145.7

145.7Defensive Efficiency72.2

-73.5Net Efficiency73.5

38.1%Effective FG%66.7%

41.1%True Shooting %65.7%

22.8%Turnover Rate12.0%

23.7%Free Throw Rate31.9%

32.2%3-Point Rate33.3%

0.41Assist / Turnover3.00

Game Summary

Cincinnati won by 55 points. The game played at approximately 74.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.