Wisconsin

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

74.1%Wisconsin

25.9%Pittsburgh

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWisconsin -5.9

PROJECTED TOTAL152.6

MODEL MONEYLINEWisconsin -286

Pittsburgh

13-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWisconsin 79

Projected Total152.6

Projected ScorePittsburgh 73

Team Comparison

WisconsinMetricPittsburgh

64.5MMH Power Index50.5

118.6Offensive Efficiency108.4

108.8Defensive Efficiency110.4

9.8Net Efficiency-2.0

6.7Strength of Schedule5.5

5.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.9

69.9Tempo65.0

54.6%Effective FG%51.4%

12.8%Turnover Rate17.3%

28.7%Offensive Rebound %33.1%

32.5%Free Throw Rate31.2%

6.9Average Margin-1.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Wisconsin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWisconsin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.5–50.5), offensive efficiency (118.6–108.4), defensive efficiency (108.8–110.4), net efficiency (9.8–-2.0).

Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.1–28.7).

Final

Wisconsin

81—75

Pittsburgh

Wisconsin by 6 • 68.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

WisconsinTEAM STATPittsburgh

29-60FG30-60

48.0%FG%50.0%

5-203PT5-23

25.0%3PT%22.0%

18-22FT10-13

82.0%FT%77.0%

33Rebounds29

9Offensive Rebounds5

12Assists11

6Turnovers8

3Steals1

—Blocks—

16Fouls19

Player Box Score

Wisconsin

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
John Tonje	Guard	38	11-19	1-5	10-10	7	1	0	33
John Blackwell	G	37	5-11	0-2	4-4	3	0	2	14
Nolan Winter	F	20	5-7	1-3	0-0	3	0	0	11
Kamari McGee	Guard	28	4-5	2-3	0-0	3	2	0	10
Max Klesmit	Guard	34	1-7	1-5	4-6	2	5	0	7
Steve Crowl	Forward	28	3-9	0-0	0-2	9	3	0	6
Jack Janicki	G	8	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	1	1	0
Xavier Amos	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0
Carter Gilmore	Forward	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0

Pittsburgh

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Ishmael Leggett	Guard	38	6-15	0-4	5-6	8	3	0	17
Cameron Corhen	F	33	7-8	0-0	2-2	2	1	0	16
Jaland Lowe	G	39	6-17	1-7	2-4	5	5	0	15
Amsal Delalic	G	16	4-4	1-1	0-0	1	1	0	9
Zack Austin	Forward	29	3-5	2-4	0-0	1	0	1	8
Guillermo Diaz Graham	F	25	3-8	1-6	1-1	7	1	0	8
Brandin Cummings	G	13	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	2
Jorge Diaz Graham	F	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0
Damian Dunn	Not Available	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.4Possessions68.4

118.4Offensive Efficiency109.6

109.6Defensive Efficiency118.4

8.8Net Efficiency-8.8

52.5%Effective FG%54.2%

57.5%True Shooting %56.7%

8.9%Turnover Rate11.6%

36.7%Free Throw Rate21.7%

33.3%3-Point Rate38.3%

2.00Assist / Turnover1.38

Game Summary

Wisconsin won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 68.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.