Purdue

30-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

92.6%Purdue

7.4%Rutgers

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -15.5

PROJECTED TOTAL150.8

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -1251

Rutgers

13-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePurdue 83

Projected Total150.8

Projected ScoreRutgers 68

Team Comparison

PurdueMetricRutgers

73.2MMH Power Index45.9

124.8Offensive Efficiency104.2

107.8Defensive Efficiency112.2

17.0Net Efficiency-8.0

7.6Strength of Schedule3.9

11.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.6

65.4Tempo67.4

57.8%Effective FG%47.4%

13.7%Turnover Rate15.0%

36.2%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

29.1%Free Throw Rate36.3%

11.1Average Margin-5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–45.9), offensive efficiency (124.8–104.2), defensive efficiency (107.8–112.2), net efficiency (17.0–-8.0).

Rutgers COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (36.3–29.1).

Final

Purdue

68—60

Rutgers

Purdue by 8 • 65.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PurdueTEAM STATRutgers

22-45FG24-64

48.9%FG%37.5%

5-193PT4-16

26.3%3PT%25.0%

19-25FT8-13

76.0%FT%61.5%

32Rebounds36

6Offensive Rebounds15

12Assists12

15Turnovers10

8Steals4

6Blocks1

11Fouls16

Player Box Score

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Zach Edey	Center	36	9-12	0-0	8-13	12	1	0	4	26
Braden Smith	G	38	7-10	3-5	2-3	6	2	0	0	19
Mason Gillis	Forward	20	3-4	2-3	0-0	1	0	1	0	8
Fletcher Loyer	G	30	1-4	0-3	5-5	0	1	1	0	7
Lance Jones	Guard	36	1-10	0-6	2-2	10	8	5	0	4
Ethan Morton	Guard	12	0-1	0-1	2-2	0	0	1	0	2
Caleb Furst	Forward	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	19	0-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	2	0
Camden Heide	F	7	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Rutgers

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Aundre Hyatt	Forward	30	5-12	2-9	3-4	4	2	1	1	15
Clifford Omoruyi	Center	30	5-10	0-0	3-6	6	0	1	0	13
Jamichael Davis	G	23	4-5	0-0	1-1	4	4	1	0	9
Derek Simpson	G	25	4-10	0-0	0-0	3	3	0	0	8
Gavin Griffiths	G	18	3-11	1-2	1-2	2	0	0	0	8
Austin Williams	Guard	16	2-2	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	4
Noah Fernandes	Guard	17	1-4	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Mawot Mag	Forward	25	0-6	0-2	0-0	1	2	1	0	0
Antwone Woolfolk	F	10	0-3	0-0	0-0	6	0	0	0	0
Oskar Palmquist	Forward	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.6Possessions65.6

103.7Offensive Efficiency91.5

91.5Defensive Efficiency103.7

12.2Net Efficiency-12.2

54.4%Effective FG%40.6%

59.8%True Shooting %42.8%

22.8%Turnover Rate15.3%

55.6%Free Throw Rate20.3%

42.2%3-Point Rate25.0%

0.80Assist / Turnover1.20

Game Summary

Purdue won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 65.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.