Tennessee

25-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

66.2%Tennessee

33.8%Texas A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTennessee -3.3

PROJECTED TOTAL154.2

MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -196

Texas A&M

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTennessee 79

Projected Total154.2

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 75

Team Comparison

TennesseeMetricTexas A&M

68.6MMH Power Index58

115.8Offensive Efficiency116.1

102.1Defensive Efficiency108.4

13.7Net Efficiency7.7

7.8Strength of Schedule4.8

3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2

68.1Tempo69.1

51.6%Effective FG%53.5%

17.3%Turnover Rate14.8%

44.5%Offensive Rebound %31.7%

38.6%Free Throw Rate37.5%

9.3Average Margin5.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Tennessee HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY66.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–58.0), defensive efficiency (102.1–108.4), net efficiency (13.7–7.7), strength of schedule (7.8–4.8).

Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (116.1–115.8), shooting efficiency (53.5–51.6), ball security (14.8–17.3).

Final

Tennessee

69—85

Texas A&M

Texas A&M by 16 • 68.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TennesseeTEAM STATTexas A&M

23-62FG28-60

37.1%FG%46.7%

8-293PT11-28

27.6%3PT%39.3%

15-25FT18-25

60.0%FT%72.0%

35Rebounds43

12Offensive Rebounds14

11Assists14

8Turnovers10

5Steals6

5Blocks5

22Fouls19

Player Box Score

Tennessee

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dalton Knecht	Guard	28	6-15	6-11	4-9	7	0	0	2	22
Zakai Zeigler	Guard	40	5-15	1-8	4-7	6	6	4	0	15
Jahmai Mashack	Guard	17	3-6	0-1	2-4	5	1	0	0	8
Jonas Aidoo	Forward	20	3-5	0-0	0-0	5	0	1	0	6
Santiago Vescovi	Guard	30	1-6	1-3	2-2	3	2	0	0	5
Tobe Awaka	F	12	2-3	0-0	1-1	3	0	0	0	5
Josiah-Jordan James	Guard	31	2-7	0-2	0-0	3	1	0	3	4
Jordan Gainey	Guard	22	1-5	0-4	2-2	1	1	0	0	4

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyrece Radford	Guard	39	9-17	2-7	7-9	5	5	0	0	27
Wade Taylor IV	Guard	35	8-18	5-11	4-5	3	7	1	0	25
Solomon Washington	F	30	4-8	1-2	2-2	7	2	0	3	11
Jace Carter	Not Available	32	3-10	2-5	0-1	4	0	2	1	8
Andersson Garcia	Forward	33	1-2	0-0	4-6	17	0	0	0	6
Manny Obaseki	Guard	8	2-4	1-3	1-2	0	0	1	1	6
Henry Coleman III	Forward	17	1-1	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	0	2
Wildens Leveque	Forward	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.9Possessions68.9

100.1Offensive Efficiency123.4

123.4Defensive Efficiency100.1

-23.2Net Efficiency23.2

43.5%Effective FG%55.8%

46.7%True Shooting %59.1%

11.4%Turnover Rate14.7%

40.3%Free Throw Rate41.7%

46.8%3-Point Rate46.7%

1.38Assist / Turnover1.40

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 68.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.