Texas A&M logo

Texas A&M

20-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
14.3%Texas A&M
85.7%Alabama
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAlabama -11.3
PROJECTED TOTAL169.9
MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama -599
Alabama logo

Alabama

24-10
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 79
Projected Total169.9
Projected ScoreAlabama 91

Team Comparison

58MMH Power Index69.5
116.1Offensive Efficiency121.6
108.4Defensive Efficiency111.2
7.7Net Efficiency10.4
4.8Strength of Schedule9.4
-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency9.5
69.1Tempo74.7
53.5%Effective FG%54.9%
14.8%Turnover Rate13.0%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %32.1%
37.5%Free Throw Rate36.9%
5.3Average Margin7.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Alabama HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–58.0), offensive efficiency (121.6–116.1), net efficiency (10.4–7.7), strength of schedule (9.4–4.8).
Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.4–111.2), free throw rate (37.5–36.9).
Final
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
75—100
Alabama logo
Alabama
Alabama by 25 • 74.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATAlabama
28-74FG37-71
37.8%FG%52.1%
4-233PT18-41
17.4%3PT%43.9%
15-23FT8-13
65.2%FT%61.5%
49Rebounds38
26Offensive Rebounds14
6Assists20
14Turnovers12
7Steals9
2Blocks6
15Fouls20

Player Box Score

Texas A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tyrece RadfordGuard3210-170-22-441110022
Solomon WashingtonF315-90-24-780100014
Henry Coleman IIIForward305-110-12-251110012
Wade Taylor IVGuard364-152-50-053100010
Jace CarterNot Available302-111-82-47010007
Manny ObasekiGuard131-51-22-21000005
Andersson GarciaForward190-20-03-412120003
Hayden HefnerGuard61-40-30-01000002
Wildens LevequeForward30-00-00-00000000
Alabama
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Mark SearsGuard328-144-73-344300023
Rylan GriffenG206-134-101-111000017
Latrell WrightsellG236-104-80-032300016
Aaron EstradaGuard265-121-50-037300011
Sam WaltersF164-62-41-181000011
Grant NelsonForward234-51-10-02203009
Mo DioubateF111-20-02-46001004
Nick PringleF211-10-01-23101003
Jarin StevensonF171-41-20-23000003
Davin Cosby Jr.G31-41-40-01100003
Mohamed WagueF60-00-00-00100000
Max ScharnowskiForward10-00-00-00001000
Kai SpearsG10-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

74.1Possessions74.1
101.2Offensive Efficiency135.0
135.0Defensive Efficiency101.2
-33.7Net Efficiency33.7
40.5%Effective FG%64.8%
44.2%True Shooting %64.8%
19.2%Turnover Rate16.0%
31.1%Free Throw Rate18.3%
31.1%3-Point Rate57.7%
0.43Assist / Turnover1.67
Game Summary
Alabama won by 25 points. The game played at approximately 74.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.