Baylor logo

Baylor

16-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.6%Baylor
74.4%BYU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBYU -7.9
PROJECTED TOTAL162.3
MODEL MONEYLINEBYU -291
BYU logo

BYU

23-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBaylor 77
Projected Total162.3
Projected ScoreBYU 85

Team Comparison

BaylorMetricBYU
58.9MMH Power Index63.9
116.7Offensive Efficiency118.3
109.5Defensive Efficiency106.8
7.2Net Efficiency11.5
4.0Strength of Schedule6.5
-2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.2
69.7Tempo70.6
54.4%Effective FG%54.7%
16.4%Turnover Rate15.2%
37.5%Offensive Rebound %33.7%
34.8%Free Throw Rate35.4%
5.1Average Margin8.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

BYU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBYU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–58.9), offensive efficiency (118.3–116.7), defensive efficiency (106.8–109.5), net efficiency (11.5–7.2).
Baylor COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (37.5–33.7).
Final
Baylor logo
Baylor
71—78
BYU logo
BYU
BYU by 7 • 62.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BaylorTEAM STATBYU
25-51FG29-66
49.0%FG%43.9%
5-203PT14-36
25.0%3PT%38.9%
16-21FT6-9
76.2%FT%66.7%
30Rebounds39
7Offensive Rebounds16
8Assists20
9Turnovers7
5Steals3
2Blocks3
17Fouls18

Player Box Score

Baylor
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jalen BridgesForward336-123-80-080110015
Ja'Kobe WalterGuard313-90-37-930000013
Yves MissiCenter255-60-03-470010013
Jayden NunnGuard253-61-22-21010009
RayJ DennisGuard392-80-42-22820006
Miro LittleG102-30-02-31000006
Josh OjianwunaF152-30-00-04000004
Langston LoveG141-21-20-12010003
Caleb LohnerForward81-20-10-00000002
BYU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jaxson RobinsonGuard234-134-94-440010016
Aly KhalifaC285-74-60-077110014
Trevin KnellGuard305-113-70-021000013
Noah WatermanForward224-71-40-02000009
Richie SaundersG214-90-20-02111008
Dallin HallG313-91-50-15700007
Spencer JohnsonGuard312-71-31-19310006
Fousseyni TraoreCenter122-30-01-35100005
Trey StewartGuard20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

62.2Possessions62.2
114.1Offensive Efficiency125.4
125.4Defensive Efficiency114.1
-11.3Net Efficiency11.3
53.9%Effective FG%54.5%
58.2%True Shooting %55.5%
14.3%Turnover Rate11.4%
41.2%Free Throw Rate13.6%
39.2%3-Point Rate54.5%
0.89Assist / Turnover2.86
Game Summary
BYU won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 62.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.