
Rider
4-25GAME THAT MATTERSAT
1.4%Rider
98.6%UCLA
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUCLA -27.9
PROJECTED TOTAL144.3
MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -7043

UCLA
24-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRider 58
Projected Total144.3
Projected ScoreUCLA 86
Team Comparison
29.1MMH Power Index63
96.3Offensive Efficiency115.9
115.3Defensive Efficiency106.9
-19.0Net Efficiency9.0
-0.9Strength of Schedule5.1
-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0
65.9Tempo66.5
43.4%Effective FG%53.5%
17.1%Turnover Rate13.4%
32.8%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
31.5%Free Throw Rate33.8%
-12.6Average Margin6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UCLA HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY98.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.0–29.1), offensive efficiency (115.9–96.3), defensive efficiency (106.9–115.3), net efficiency (9.0–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.8–30.7).