Houston logo

Houston

29-7
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
91.8%Houston
8.2%Notre Dame
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHouston -14.8
PROJECTED TOTAL145.9
MODEL MONEYLINEHouston -1120
Notre Dame logo

Notre Dame

13-17
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHouston 80
Projected Total145.9
Projected ScoreNotre Dame 66

Team Comparison

76MMH Power Index49.7
118.4Offensive Efficiency110.3
95.9Defensive Efficiency111.2
22.5Net Efficiency-0.9
5.9Strength of Schedule4.7
18.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6
65.2Tempo68.0
52.3%Effective FG%53.0%
12.9%Turnover Rate17.0%
35.3%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
26.9%Free Throw Rate34.7%
14.7Average Margin-0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Houston HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHouston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (76.0–49.7), offensive efficiency (118.4–110.3), defensive efficiency (95.9–111.2), net efficiency (22.5–-0.9).
Notre Dame COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.0–52.3), free throw rate (34.7–26.9).
Final
Houston logo
Houston
65—54
Notre Dame logo
Notre Dame
Houston by 11 • 61.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HoustonTEAM STATNotre Dame
27-60FG19-49
45.0%FG%39.0%
6-233PT7-21
26.0%3PT%33.0%
5-9FT9-14
56.0%FT%64.0%
32Rebounds34
8Offensive Rebounds7
19Assists12
5Turnovers12
5Steals1
2Blocks—
16Fouls12

Player Box Score

Houston
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Emanuel SharpG346-133-92-244000017
Terrance ArceneauxG236-71-20-032100013
Milos UzanG374-112-50-039100010
J'Wan RobertsForward344-80-01-38201009
L.J. CryerGuard372-110-62-22110006
Joseph TuglerF113-50-00-23110006
Ja'Vier FrancisForward112-30-00-02001004
Mylik WilsonGuard60-20-10-01010000
Ramon Walker Jr.G40-00-00-00000000
Cedric LathC30-00-00-00000000
Notre Dame
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tae DavisF379-151-23-584000022
Braeden ShrewsberryG366-184-130-012000016
Matt AlloccoGuard382-72-52-25400008
Kebba NjieF341-40-03-46000005
Logan ImesG291-20-11-25200003
Julian Roper IIGuard150-10-00-03010000
J.R. KoniecznyF60-20-00-01000000
Burke ChebuharForward40-00-00-01000000
Nikita KonstantynovskyiForward10-00-00-10000000

Advanced Game Stats

61.0Possessions61.0
106.6Offensive Efficiency88.5
88.5Defensive Efficiency106.6
18.0Net Efficiency-18.0
50.0%Effective FG%45.9%
50.6%True Shooting %48.5%
8.2%Turnover Rate19.8%
15.0%Free Throw Rate28.6%
38.3%3-Point Rate42.9%
3.80Assist / Turnover1.00
Game Summary
Houston won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 61.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.