
UT Martin
22-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.9%UT Martin
93.1%Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -15.7
PROJECTED TOTAL140.3
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -1349

Tennessee
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Martin 62
Projected Total140.3
Projected ScoreTennessee 78
Team Comparison
49.8MMH Power Index68.6
103.8Offensive Efficiency115.8
94.0Defensive Efficiency102.1
9.8Net Efficiency13.7
-4.8Strength of Schedule7.8
-0.8Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
67.2Tempo68.1
49.5%Effective FG%51.6%
21.4%Turnover Rate17.3%
37.9%Offensive Rebound %44.5%
37.5%Free Throw Rate38.6%
6.6Average Margin9.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY93.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–49.8), offensive efficiency (115.8–103.8), net efficiency (13.7–9.8), strength of schedule (7.8–-4.8).
UT Martin COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (94.0–102.1).