UT Martin logo

UT Martin

22-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.9%UT Martin
93.1%Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -15.7
PROJECTED TOTAL140.3
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -1349
Tennessee logo

Tennessee

25-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Martin 62
Projected Total140.3
Projected ScoreTennessee 78

Team Comparison

49.8MMH Power Index68.6
103.8Offensive Efficiency115.8
94.0Defensive Efficiency102.1
9.8Net Efficiency13.7
-4.8Strength of Schedule7.8
-0.8Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
67.2Tempo68.1
49.5%Effective FG%51.6%
21.4%Turnover Rate17.3%
37.9%Offensive Rebound %44.5%
37.5%Free Throw Rate38.6%
6.6Average Margin9.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Tennessee HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY93.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–49.8), offensive efficiency (115.8–103.8), net efficiency (13.7–9.8), strength of schedule (7.8–-4.8).
UT Martin COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (94.0–102.1).
Final
UT Martin logo
UT Martin
35—78
Tennessee logo
Tennessee
Tennessee by 43 • 61.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT MartinTEAM STATTennessee
12-53FG30-63
23.0%FG%48.0%
6-313PT10-37
19.0%3PT%27.0%
5-7FT8-10
71.0%FT%80.0%
24Rebounds49
10Offensive Rebounds20
8Assists22
18Turnovers11
7Steals6
—Blocks9
14Fouls8

Player Box Score

UT Martin
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Josue GrullonG286-163-100-130100015
Stefano FaloppaF192-31-12-23210007
Matija ŽužicG212-72-60-00000006
Carlos CortijoGuard251-80-40-01100002
Filip RadakovicG200-10-02-24010002
Andrija BukumirovicF91-30-10-01000002
Lamine NiangF120-30-11-23000001
Afan TrnkaG210-10-10-00010000
Vlad SalaridzeF190-40-10-02430000
AJ HopkinsF130-30-30-04000000
Tarence GuinyardG110-30-20-00100000
Lucas WilliamsG20-10-10-00000000
Tennessee
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chaz LanierGuard306-164-132-222000018
Zakai ZeiglerGuard304-113-100-039200011
Felix OkparaF215-60-00-0110040010
Igor Milicic Jr.Forward264-91-50-013112009
Jordan GaineyGuard253-71-41-30301008
Jahmai MashackGuard262-30-13-36410007
Darlinstone DubarGuard133-61-40-03100007
Cade PhillipsF202-30-02-26012006
Grant HurstG11-10-00-00000002
Bishop BoswellG60-10-00-01210000
Campbell DuncanG10-00-00-00000000
Gavin PaullG10-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

61.6Possessions61.6
56.8Offensive Efficiency126.6
126.6Defensive Efficiency56.8
-69.8Net Efficiency69.8
28.3%Effective FG%55.6%
31.1%True Shooting %57.6%
28.0%Turnover Rate18.7%
13.2%Free Throw Rate15.9%
58.5%3-Point Rate58.7%
0.44Assist / Turnover2.00
Game Summary
Tennessee won by 43 points. The game played at approximately 61.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.