Arizona logo

Arizona

36-3
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
93.8%Arizona
6.2%Arizona State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADArizona -17.5
PROJECTED TOTAL158.3
MODEL MONEYLINEArizona -1513
Arizona State logo

Arizona State

17-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreArizona 88
Projected Total158.3
Projected ScoreArizona State 70

Team Comparison

79.9MMH Power Index51
120.3Offensive Efficiency108.1
96.9Defensive Efficiency110.9
23.4Net Efficiency-2.8
8.0Strength of Schedule7.0
17.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.5
71.6Tempo70.6
55.0%Effective FG%51.3%
15.1%Turnover Rate17.1%
37.8%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
45.3%Free Throw Rate40.2%
16.8Average Margin-1.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Arizona HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY93.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMArizona holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (79.9–51.0), offensive efficiency (120.3–108.1), defensive efficiency (96.9–110.9), net efficiency (23.4–-2.8).
Final
Arizona logo
Arizona
85—85
Arizona State logo
Arizona State
Tied • 71.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ArizonaTEAM STATArizona State
32-59FG32-59
54.2%FG%54.2%
8-213PT8-21
38.1%3PT%38.1%
13-18FT13-18
72.2%FT%72.2%
43Rebounds43
10Offensive Rebounds10
18Assists18
14Turnovers14
5Steals5
2Blocks2
19Fouls19

Player Box Score

Arizona
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kylan BoswellG247-93-40-022000017
Caleb LoveGuard335-124-82-285100016
Oumar BalloCenter296-60-02-3130010014
Pelle LarssonGuard345-131-51-133100012
Keshad JohnsonForward292-70-46-835110010
Jaden BradleyG243-60-01-33120007
KJ LewisG173-40-01-14200007
Motiejus KrivasC101-20-00-00000002
Arizona State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kylan BoswellG247-93-40-022000017
Caleb LoveGuard335-124-82-285100016
Oumar BalloCenter296-60-02-3130010014
Pelle LarssonGuard345-131-51-133100012
Keshad JohnsonForward292-70-46-835110010
Jaden BradleyG243-60-01-33120007
KJ LewisG173-40-01-14200007
Motiejus KrivasC101-20-00-00000002

Advanced Game Stats

71.6Possessions71.6
118.7Offensive Efficiency118.7
118.7Defensive Efficiency118.7
0.0Net Efficiency0.0
61.0%Effective FG%61.0%
62.9%True Shooting %62.9%
19.6%Turnover Rate19.6%
30.5%Free Throw Rate30.5%
35.6%3-Point Rate35.6%
1.29Assist / Turnover1.29
Game Summary
Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 71.6 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.