Stonehill

12-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

10.8%Stonehill

89.2%Marquette

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMarquette -12.6

PROJECTED TOTAL143.1

MODEL MONEYLINEMarquette -826

Marquette

12-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreStonehill 65

Projected Total143.1

Projected ScoreMarquette 78

Team Comparison

StonehillMetricMarquette

37.9MMH Power Index52.3

97.5Offensive Efficiency106.0

100.7Defensive Efficiency106.9

-3.2Net Efficiency-0.9

-5.4Strength of Schedule4.2

-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5

68.1Tempo70.9

48.0%Effective FG%50.5%

19.1%Turnover Rate16.0%

28.4%Offensive Rebound %29.3%

29.2%Free Throw Rate33.8%

-2.2Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Marquette HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMarquette holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.3–37.9), offensive efficiency (106.0–97.5), net efficiency (-0.9–-3.2), strength of schedule (4.2–-5.4).

Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–106.9).

Final

Stonehill

59—94

Marquette

Marquette by 35 • 68.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

StonehillTEAM STATMarquette

24-54FG37-61

44.0%FG%61.0%

6-243PT10-21

25.0%3PT%48.0%

5-7FT10-17

71.0%FT%59.0%

21Rebounds32

6Offensive Rebounds12

22Assists15

18Turnovers10

7Steals11

1Blocks2

13Fouls7

Player Box Score

Stonehill

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Amir Nesbitt	Guard	29	6-10	1-5	1-1	2	4	0	0	14
Hermann Koffi	G	36	6-13	1-8	0-0	4	2	0	0	13
Chas Stinson	G	26	4-6	0-0	2-2	1	1	3	0	10
Ethan Meuser	F	22	3-7	3-5	0-0	4	0	2	0	9
Todd Brogna	F	26	3-4	0-1	0-0	1	2	0	0	6
Louie Semona	F	25	1-5	1-2	0-0	2	5	0	0	3
Pearse McGuinn	F	10	0-3	0-2	2-4	2	1	0	1	2
Alex Bates IV	Guard	7	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	2	1	0	2
Christopher Melis	Forward	13	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	5	1	0	0
Jake TenBerge	Guard	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Charlie Diamantis	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Neal Marquardt	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Kesean Shillingford	C	1	0-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Marquette

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
David Joplin	Forward	26	10-12	4-5	3-3	7	0	0	0	27
Kam Jones	Guard	24	6-7	1-2	1-1	2	4	0	0	14
Damarius Owens	F	20	5-8	3-3	1-2	4	2	1	1	14
Stevie Mitchell	Guard	20	4-6	0-1	1-3	0	0	2	0	9
Chase Ross	G	20	4-7	0-2	0-0	1	2	1	0	8
Caedin Hamilton	F	13	3-3	0-0	0-0	3	4	1	0	6
Ben Gold	F	19	1-2	1-2	2-2	2	2	1	1	5
Tre Norman	G	16	2-5	1-2	0-2	2	1	1	0	5
Zaide Lowery	G	18	1-2	0-1	2-2	4	0	1	0	4
Royce Parham	F	17	1-5	0-2	0-2	3	0	3	0	2
Casey O'Malley	G	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jack Anderson	Guard	2	0-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Jake Ciardo	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jonah Lucas	G	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Cameron Brown	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.2Possessions68.2

86.5Offensive Efficiency137.8

137.8Defensive Efficiency86.5

-51.3Net Efficiency51.3

50.0%Effective FG%68.9%

51.5%True Shooting %68.0%

26.0%Turnover Rate14.9%

13.0%Free Throw Rate27.9%

44.4%3-Point Rate34.4%

1.22Assist / Turnover1.50

Game Summary

Marquette won by 35 points. The game played at approximately 68.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.