Alabama State logo

Alabama State

10-22
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.2%Alabama State
95.8%Cincinnati
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCincinnati -20.6
PROJECTED TOTAL146.3
MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -2281
Cincinnati logo

Cincinnati

18-15
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAlabama State 63
Projected Total146.3
Projected ScoreCincinnati 83

Team Comparison

38MMH Power Index61.5
101.7Offensive Efficiency105.3
107.4Defensive Efficiency97.3
-5.7Net Efficiency8.0
-6.2Strength of Schedule5.1
0.0Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4
71.9Tempo69.4
48.2%Effective FG%50.6%
18.2%Turnover Rate17.0%
32.6%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
35.8%Free Throw Rate30.7%
-4.1Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–38.0), offensive efficiency (105.3–101.7), defensive efficiency (97.3–107.4), net efficiency (8.0–-5.7).
Alabama State COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.6–30.6), free throw rate (35.8–30.7).
Final
Alabama State logo
Alabama State
59—77
Cincinnati logo
Cincinnati
Cincinnati by 18 • 70.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Alabama StateTEAM STATCincinnati
20-66FG31-69
30.0%FG%45.0%
7-303PT10-31
23.0%3PT%32.0%
12-14FT5-12
86.0%FT%42.0%
35Rebounds52
9Offensive Rebounds15
12Assists16
7Turnovers10
8Steals6
3Blocks5
11Fouls10

Player Box Score

Alabama State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Amarr KnoxG369-202-74-552400024
Jalen KeagoG163-63-53-310000012
TJ MadlockGuard311-110-14-43521006
Tyler MackG212-51-40-05110005
Micah SimpsonG221-81-61-22100004
Shawn FulcherGuard171-40-00-01110002
Ubong OkonC161-10-00-06100002
JaSteven WalkerF161-40-30-01000002
D'Ante BassForward141-60-40-02101002
Mario AndrewsC110-10-00-03001000
Cincinnati
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Simas LukosiusGuard276-154-100-044000016
Jizzle JamesG225-92-51-285200013
Aziz BandaogoForward215-80-00-093010010
Dillon MitchellF185-70-10-582100010
Day Day ThomasG133-63-40-03010009
Arrinten PageF173-40-01-12022007
Josh ReedF172-40-12-26000006
Tyler BetseyF222-51-40-04101005
Halvine DzellatC20-10-01-20001001
Connor HickmanG240-60-40-02100000
Rayvon GriffithF110-30-10-03000000
CJ Fredrick Jr.Guard60-10-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

70.2Possessions70.2
84.0Offensive Efficiency109.7
109.7Defensive Efficiency84.0
-25.6Net Efficiency25.6
35.6%Effective FG%52.2%
40.6%True Shooting %51.5%
9.9%Turnover Rate14.3%
21.2%Free Throw Rate17.4%
45.5%3-Point Rate44.9%
1.71Assist / Turnover1.60
Game Summary
Cincinnati won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 70.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.