
Creighton
15-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
20.9%Creighton
79.1%Texas A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -9.8
PROJECTED TOTAL155.5
MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -378

Texas A&M
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCreighton 73
Projected Total155.5
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 83
Team Comparison
50.6MMH Power Index58
109.0Offensive Efficiency116.1
109.5Defensive Efficiency108.4
-0.5Net Efficiency7.7
5.1Strength of Schedule4.8
-5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2
68.9Tempo69.1
53.0%Effective FG%53.5%
16.6%Turnover Rate14.8%
26.6%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
29.0%Free Throw Rate37.5%
-0.3Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY79.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–50.6), offensive efficiency (116.1–109.0), defensive efficiency (108.4–109.5), net efficiency (7.7–-0.5).
Creighton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.1–4.8), recent form (-5.2–-7.2).