Texas Tech logo

Texas Tech

23-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.2%Texas Tech
83.8%Houston
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHouston -11.6
PROJECTED TOTAL147.5
MODEL MONEYLINEHouston -517
Houston logo

Houston

29-7
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas Tech 68
Projected Total147.5
Projected ScoreHouston 80

Team Comparison

65.8MMH Power Index76
117.8Offensive Efficiency118.4
107.2Defensive Efficiency95.9
10.6Net Efficiency22.5
9.4Strength of Schedule5.9
0.9Last 10 Net Efficiency18.9
68.1Tempo65.2
56.4%Effective FG%52.3%
15.8%Turnover Rate12.9%
32.6%Offensive Rebound %35.3%
28.2%Free Throw Rate26.9%
7.2Average Margin14.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Houston HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY83.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHouston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (76.0–65.8), offensive efficiency (118.4–117.8), defensive efficiency (95.9–107.2), net efficiency (22.5–10.6).
Texas Tech COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (9.4–5.9), shooting efficiency (56.4–52.3), free throw rate (28.2–26.9).
Final
Texas Tech logo
Texas Tech
59—82
Houston logo
Houston
Houston by 23 • 65.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas TechTEAM STATHouston
15-45FG29-59
33.3%FG%49.2%
7-223PT12-28
31.8%3PT%42.9%
22-24FT12-14
91.7%FT%85.7%
31Rebounds30
9Offensive Rebounds10
10Assists16
19Turnovers8
4Steals7
1Blocks4
14Fouls18

Player Box Score

Texas Tech
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chance McMillianGuard375-83-62-252100015
Joe ToussaintGuard301-60-28-833200010
Eemeli YalahoF263-71-33-430000010
Kerwin WaltonGuard332-62-42-23010008
Pop IsaacsG342-131-61-14200006
Robert Jennings IIF161-20-04-45001006
Lamar WashingtonG241-30-12-35300004
Houston
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
L.J. CryerGuard356-156-112-221100020
Emanuel SharpG375-124-83-342000017
Jamal SheadNot Available333-91-45-6410000012
Ja'Vier FrancisForward295-60-02-290230012
Mylik WilsonGuard324-71-30-06020009
Damian DunnNot Available174-60-10-02020008
J'Wan RobertsForward71-20-00-02300002
Cedric LathC71-10-00-10001002

Advanced Game Stats

65.1Possessions65.1
90.6Offensive Efficiency126.0
126.0Defensive Efficiency90.6
-35.3Net Efficiency35.3
41.1%Effective FG%59.3%
52.3%True Shooting %62.5%
28.6%Turnover Rate12.6%
53.3%Free Throw Rate23.7%
48.9%3-Point Rate47.5%
0.53Assist / Turnover2.00
Game Summary
Houston won by 23 points. The game played at approximately 65.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.