Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

23.7%Texas A&M

76.3%Kentucky

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADKentucky -7.9

PROJECTED TOTAL158.2

MODEL MONEYLINEKentucky -322

Kentucky

22-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 75

Projected Total158.2

Projected ScoreKentucky 83

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricKentucky

58MMH Power Index63.9

116.1Offensive Efficiency115.2

108.4Defensive Efficiency106.3

7.7Net Efficiency8.9

4.8Strength of Schedule8.7

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0

69.1Tempo69.9

53.5%Effective FG%53.2%

14.8%Turnover Rate15.4%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %33.2%

37.5%Free Throw Rate38.0%

5.3Average Margin6.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Kentucky HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKentucky holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–58.0), defensive efficiency (106.3–108.4), net efficiency (8.9–7.7), strength of schedule (8.7–4.8).

Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (116.1–115.2), shooting efficiency (53.5–53.2), ball security (14.8–15.4).

Final

Texas A&M

97—87

Kentucky

Texas A&M by 10 • 75.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATKentucky

32-69FG30-60

46.4%FG%50.0%

11-263PT11-27

42.3%3PT%40.7%

22-30FT16-22

73.3%FT%72.7%

38Rebounds34

13Offensive Rebounds9

14Assists21

6Turnovers14

9Steals4

3Blocks10

17Fouls24

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Wade Taylor IV	Guard	36	11-24	6-14	4-5	2	3	1	0	32
Tyrece Radford	Guard	38	8-18	1-4	6-9	7	6	1	0	23
Manny Obaseki	Guard	36	6-12	1-1	4-6	3	3	3	1	17
Solomon Washington	F	31	4-7	2-3	1-2	7	1	2	2	11
Andersson Garcia	Forward	23	0-1	0-0	5-6	7	1	1	0	5
Jace Carter	Not Available	14	1-4	1-4	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Henry Coleman III	Forward	14	0-0	0-0	2-2	4	0	1	0	2
Wildens Leveque	Forward	6	1-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Hayden Hefner	Guard	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2

Kentucky

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rob Dillingham	Guard	29	9-19	5-10	4-4	4	7	0	0	27
Reed Sheppard	Guard	32	5-8	3-6	1-2	3	4	2	0	14
Antonio Reeves	Guard	18	4-7	2-4	3-5	1	1	0	0	13
DJ Wagner	G	29	3-9	1-4	1-1	4	5	1	0	8
Tre Mitchell	Center	21	3-3	0-0	1-2	9	0	0	0	7
Adou Thiero	Forward	18	1-3	0-0	5-6	5	0	0	3	7
Zvonimir Ivisic	F	16	3-3	0-0	1-2	2	1	1	3	7
Ugonna Onyenso	C	19	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	2	2
Justin Edwards	Forward	15	1-6	0-3	0-0	2	2	0	1	2
Aaron Bradshaw	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

75.9Possessions75.9

127.8Offensive Efficiency114.6

114.6Defensive Efficiency127.8

13.2Net Efficiency-13.2

54.3%Effective FG%59.2%

58.3%True Shooting %61.7%

7.9%Turnover Rate18.6%

43.5%Free Throw Rate36.7%

37.7%3-Point Rate45.0%

2.33Assist / Turnover1.50

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 75.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.