Wagner logo

Wagner

14-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
11.2%Wagner
88.8%Howard
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHoward -14.2
PROJECTED TOTAL145.8
MODEL MONEYLINEHoward -793
Howard logo

Howard

24-11
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWagner 66
Projected Total145.8
Projected ScoreHoward 80

Team Comparison

42.9MMH Power Index56.9
105.5Offensive Efficiency110.8
106.1Defensive Efficiency98.5
-0.6Net Efficiency12.3
-5.0Strength of Schedule-7.1
0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency21.5
67.6Tempo70.2
50.2%Effective FG%52.1%
18.9%Turnover Rate18.8%
34.0%Offensive Rebound %37.0%
31.6%Free Throw Rate45.5%
-0.4Average Margin8.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Howard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY88.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHoward holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–42.9), offensive efficiency (110.8–105.5), defensive efficiency (98.5–106.1), net efficiency (12.3–-0.6).
Wagner COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-5.0–-7.1).
Final
Wagner logo
Wagner
71—68
Howard logo
Howard
Wagner by 3 • 64.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

WagnerTEAM STATHoward
29-55FG22-57
52.7%FG%38.6%
8-173PT7-24
47.1%3PT%29.2%
5-9FT17-21
55.6%FT%81.0%
28Rebounds36
3Offensive Rebounds11
16Assists13
8Turnovers8
5Steals5
5Blocks1
16Fouls12

Player Box Score

Wagner
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Melvin Council Jr.G4010-181-20-357200021
Julian BrownGuard404-73-44-410000015
Keyontae LewisF295-70-00-070030010
Tahron AllenNot Available215-100-30-041100010
Tyje KeltonF242-62-41-25012007
Javier EzquerraG402-52-40-05810006
Seck ZongoForward61-20-00-00000002
Howard
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Seth TownsForward364-113-55-553110016
Bryce HarrisG355-130-36-761200016
Marcus DockeryGuard403-102-81-12310009
Isiah WarfieldGuard294-90-31-21410009
Jordan HairstonGuard403-102-50-25200008
Dominick CampbellForward111-10-04-48000006
Shy OdomForward61-10-00-00000002
Ose OkojieG21-20-00-00000002
Elijah WilliamsGuard10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

64.2Possessions64.2
110.6Offensive Efficiency105.9
105.9Defensive Efficiency110.6
4.7Net Efficiency-4.7
60.0%Effective FG%44.7%
59.9%True Shooting %50.8%
12.4%Turnover Rate12.5%
16.4%Free Throw Rate36.8%
30.9%3-Point Rate42.1%
2.00Assist / Turnover1.63
Game Summary
Wagner won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 64.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.