
Duquesne
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.1%Duquesne
87.9%BYU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBYU -13.1
PROJECTED TOTAL159.7
MODEL MONEYLINEBYU -726

BYU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDuquesne 73
Projected Total159.7
Projected ScoreBYU 86
Team Comparison
50.7MMH Power Index63.9
110.6Offensive Efficiency118.3
106.2Defensive Efficiency106.8
4.4Net Efficiency11.5
0.6Strength of Schedule6.5
-5.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.2
70.8Tempo70.6
53.4%Effective FG%54.7%
17.7%Turnover Rate15.2%
30.6%Offensive Rebound %33.7%
38.2%Free Throw Rate35.4%
3.1Average Margin8.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
BYU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBYU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–50.7), offensive efficiency (118.3–110.6), net efficiency (11.5–4.4), strength of schedule (6.5–0.6).
Duquesne COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.2–106.8), free throw rate (38.2–35.4).