Grambling

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

1.7%Grambling

98.3%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -24.8

PROJECTED TOTAL147.9

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -5782

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrambling 62

Projected Total147.9

Projected ScorePurdue 86

Team Comparison

GramblingMetricPurdue

41.4MMH Power Index73.2

100.7Offensive Efficiency124.8

100.4Defensive Efficiency107.8

0.3Net Efficiency17.0

-5.7Strength of Schedule7.6

-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

69.9Tempo65.4

49.2%Effective FG%57.8%

20.9%Turnover Rate13.7%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

42.2%Free Throw Rate29.1%

0.2Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY98.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–41.4), offensive efficiency (124.8–100.7), net efficiency (17.0–0.3), strength of schedule (7.6–-5.7).

Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.4–107.8), free throw rate (42.2–29.1).

Final

Grambling

50—78

Purdue

Purdue by 28 • 61.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GramblingTEAM STATPurdue

20-55FG28-59

36.4%FG%47.5%

3-123PT9-24

25.0%3PT%37.5%

7-10FT13-22

70.0%FT%59.1%

23Rebounds48

5Offensive Rebounds18

11Assists23

6Turnovers10

8Steals4

6Blocks5

19Fouls6

Player Box Score

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tra'Michael Moton	Guard	38	8-18	3-8	2-2	4	2	1	0	21
Kintavious Dozier	G	24	6-17	0-1	4-4	4	1	1	1	16
Mikale Stevenson	G	22	3-7	0-0	0-0	4	1	4	0	6
Jonathan Aku	Forward	14	1-1	0-0	1-2	1	2	0	0	3
Jourdan Smith	Guard	21	1-1	0-0	0-2	1	0	1	1	2
Malik Lamin	Center	16	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	2	0	2	2
Antwan Burnett	G	29	0-3	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Jimel Cofer Jr.	G	17	0-2	0-1	0-0	4	1	1	1	0
Zahad Munford	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Zach Edey	Center	31	11-17	0-0	8-14	21	2	0	3	30
Braden Smith	G	34	4-10	3-9	0-0	5	10	1	0	11
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	23	5-10	0-0	1-1	7	2	0	0	11
Fletcher Loyer	G	25	3-4	2-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	8
Camden Heide	F	22	2-4	1-3	3-4	3	1	1	0	8
Lance Jones	Guard	21	2-6	2-4	0-1	1	2	1	1	6
Carson Barrett	Guard	2	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
William Berg	C	2	0-0	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	1
Mason Gillis	Forward	17	0-3	0-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Myles Colvin	G	12	0-3	0-2	0-0	3	3	0	0	0
Caleb Furst	Forward	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	0	0
Brian Waddell	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Chase Martin	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Ethan Morton	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.2Possessions61.2

81.7Offensive Efficiency127.5

127.5Defensive Efficiency81.7

-45.8Net Efficiency45.8

39.1%Effective FG%55.1%

41.8%True Shooting %56.2%

9.9%Turnover Rate16.3%

18.2%Free Throw Rate37.3%

21.8%3-Point Rate40.7%

1.83Assist / Turnover2.30

Game Summary

Purdue won by 28 points. The game played at approximately 61.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.