
Longwood
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
2.3%Longwood
97.7%Houston
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHouston -23.7
PROJECTED TOTAL146.8
MODEL MONEYLINEHouston -4248

Houston
29-7MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLongwood 62
Projected Total146.8
Projected ScoreHouston 85
Team Comparison
47MMH Power Index76
108.1Offensive Efficiency118.4
103.0Defensive Efficiency95.9
5.1Net Efficiency22.5
-6.4Strength of Schedule5.9
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency18.9
71.9Tempo65.2
51.4%Effective FG%52.3%
19.3%Turnover Rate12.9%
35.4%Offensive Rebound %35.3%
42.0%Free Throw Rate26.9%
3.6Average Margin14.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Houston HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY97.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHouston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (76.0–47.0), offensive efficiency (118.4–108.1), defensive efficiency (95.9–103.0), net efficiency (22.5–5.1).
Longwood COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.4–35.3), free throw rate (42.0–26.9).