New Mexico

26-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

47.9%New Mexico

52.1%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -1.0

PROJECTED TOTAL144.6

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -109

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNew Mexico 72

Projected Total144.6

Projected ScoreClemson 73

Team Comparison

New MexicoMetricClemson

63.7MMH Power Index59.9

114.8Offensive Efficiency112.6

100.2Defensive Efficiency101.4

14.6Net Efficiency11.2

2.0Strength of Schedule4.6

8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

70.7Tempo63.6

53.7%Effective FG%53.0%

14.8%Turnover Rate14.0%

30.5%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

36.5%Free Throw Rate38.1%

10.3Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

New Mexico HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNew Mexico holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.7–59.9), offensive efficiency (114.8–112.6), defensive efficiency (100.2–101.4), net efficiency (14.6–11.2).

Clemson COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.6–2.0), ball security (14.0–14.8), free throw rate (38.1–36.5).

Final

New Mexico

56—77

Clemson

Clemson by 21 • 71.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

New MexicoTEAM STATClemson

19-64FG28-63

29.7%FG%44.4%

3-233PT7-21

13.0%3PT%33.3%

15-23FT14-19

65.2%FT%73.7%

42Rebounds41

17Offensive Rebounds10

6Assists16

13Turnovers9

4Steals7

2Blocks4

16Fouls20

Player Box Score

New Mexico

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Nelly Junior Joseph	Center	34	5-9	0-0	4-7	12	1	0	0	14
Jaelen House	Guard	31	4-14	2-8	2-2	2	2	0	0	12
Donovan Dent	G	33	3-8	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	6
JT Toppin	F	32	2-7	0-1	2-4	10	1	1	2	6
Jamal Mashburn Jr.	Guard	23	1-11	0-6	4-4	1	0	0	0	6
Tru Washington	G	21	2-8	1-4	1-1	7	1	2	0	6
Mustapha Amzil	Forward	14	1-4	0-2	1-3	3	0	1	0	3
Jemarl Baker Jr.	Guard	9	1-3	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Sebastian Forsling	Center	1	0-0	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Quinton Webb	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Braden Appelhans	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chase Hunter	Guard	31	8-16	1-4	4-7	3	6	2	0	21
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	27	6-10	1-3	3-4	12	0	0	0	16
PJ Hall	Center	19	5-9	2-3	2-2	3	0	1	0	14
Joseph Girard III	Guard	35	2-12	2-8	1-2	2	3	0	0	7
Jack Clark	Forward	36	1-2	0-1	4-4	8	4	1	1	6
RJ Godfrey	F	21	3-6	0-0	0-0	5	1	1	3	6
Chauncey Wiggins	F	12	2-6	1-1	0-0	3	0	1	0	5
Dillon Hunter	G	14	1-2	0-1	0-0	1	2	1	0	2
Joshua Beadle	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Daniel Nauseef	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Andrew Latiff	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Matt Kelly	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.0Possessions71.0

78.9Offensive Efficiency108.5

108.5Defensive Efficiency78.9

-29.6Net Efficiency29.6

32.0%Effective FG%50.0%

37.4%True Shooting %53.5%

18.3%Turnover Rate12.7%

35.9%Free Throw Rate30.2%

35.9%3-Point Rate33.3%

0.46Assist / Turnover1.78

Game Summary

Clemson won by 21 points. The game played at approximately 71.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.