Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

18.1%Texas A&M

81.9%Nebraska

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNebraska -10.7

PROJECTED TOTAL150.9

MODEL MONEYLINENebraska -452

Nebraska

28-7

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 70

Projected Total150.9

Projected ScoreNebraska 81

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricNebraska

58MMH Power Index67

116.1Offensive Efficiency114.4

108.4Defensive Efficiency98.3

7.7Net Efficiency16.1

4.8Strength of Schedule6.1

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8

69.1Tempo67.3

53.5%Effective FG%55.6%

14.8%Turnover Rate14.4%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

37.5%Free Throw Rate26.9%

5.3Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Nebraska HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNebraska holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.0–58.0), defensive efficiency (98.3–108.4), net efficiency (16.1–7.7), strength of schedule (6.1–4.8).

Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (116.1–114.4), offensive rebounding (31.7–26.3), free throw rate (37.5–26.9).

Final

Texas A&M

98—83

Nebraska

Texas A&M by 15 • 74.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATNebraska

35-71FG27-59

49.3%FG%45.8%

13-233PT7-22

56.5%3PT%31.8%

15-20FT22-24

75.0%FT%91.7%

40Rebounds28

14Offensive Rebounds7

16Assists15

8Turnovers10

3Steals5

6Blocks2

21Fouls17

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Wade Taylor IV	Guard	26	8-14	7-10	2-2	1	5	1	0	25
Manny Obaseki	Guard	30	8-17	3-5	3-5	3	1	0	0	22
Tyrece Radford	Guard	35	8-17	1-1	3-5	10	5	0	0	20
Jace Carter	Not Available	28	5-9	1-3	2-2	7	2	2	0	13
Henry Coleman III	Forward	25	4-5	0-0	2-2	5	1	0	1	10
Solomon Washington	F	25	2-5	1-2	2-2	4	0	0	4	7
Wildens Leveque	Forward	8	0-1	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	0	1
Andersson Garcia	Forward	10	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	1	0
Hayden Hefner	Guard	9	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Jaelyn Lee	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Eli Lawrence	Guard	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Nebraska

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Brice Williams	Guard	34	7-15	1-4	9-10	4	4	1	1	24
Keisei Tominaga	Guard	29	7-17	5-11	2-2	2	1	0	1	21
Josiah Allick	Forward	32	6-11	0-0	2-2	11	3	0	0	14
Juwan Gary	Forward	25	3-5	0-0	3-4	2	3	3	0	9
Rienk Mast	F	29	2-4	1-2	2-2	4	2	0	0	7
Jamarques Lawrence	G	23	1-3	0-2	4-4	0	2	0	0	6
CJ Wilcher	Guard	12	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	1	0	2
Sam Hoiberg	G	11	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Matar Diop	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Cale Jacobsen	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jeffrey Grace III	Guard	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

74.0Possessions74.0

132.4Offensive Efficiency112.2

112.2Defensive Efficiency132.4

20.3Net Efficiency-20.3

58.5%Effective FG%51.7%

60.9%True Shooting %58.9%

10.7%Turnover Rate13.6%

28.2%Free Throw Rate40.7%

32.4%3-Point Rate37.3%

2.00Assist / Turnover1.50

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 74.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.