Utah State

29-7

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

20.7%Utah State

79.3%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -8.0

PROJECTED TOTAL155.2

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -383

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUtah State 74

Projected Total155.2

Projected ScorePurdue 82

Team Comparison

Utah StateMetricPurdue

65.7MMH Power Index73.2

119.7Offensive Efficiency124.8

103.1Defensive Efficiency107.8

16.6Net Efficiency17.0

3.5Strength of Schedule7.6

0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

68.6Tempo65.4

56.9%Effective FG%57.8%

15.1%Turnover Rate13.7%

33.0%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

39.1%Free Throw Rate29.1%

11.4Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY79.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–65.7), offensive efficiency (124.8–119.7), net efficiency (17.0–16.6), strength of schedule (7.6–3.5).

Utah State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.1–107.8), free throw rate (39.1–29.1), average scoring margin (11.4–11.1).

Final

Utah State

67—106

Purdue

Purdue by 39 • 73.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Utah StateTEAM STATPurdue

23-64FG38-68

35.9%FG%55.9%

9-273PT11-23

33.3%3PT%47.8%

12-16FT19-23

75.0%FT%82.6%

26Rebounds49

7Offensive Rebounds13

9Assists29

8Turnovers9

5Steals5

4Blocks5

20Fouls10

Player Box Score

Utah State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Great Osobor	Forward	33	4-11	0-2	6-7	6	0	2	0	14
Josh Uduje	Guard	22	4-8	2-3	3-4	0	1	1	0	13
Darius Brown II	Guard	33	5-9	2-4	0-0	2	4	1	0	12
Ian Martinez	Guard	32	4-10	2-5	1-3	2	2	0	2	11
Mason Falslev	G	26	4-9	2-4	0-0	5	0	0	2	10
Javon Jackson	G	16	1-5	1-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Karson Templin	F	12	0-4	0-1	2-2	1	0	1	0	2
Kalifa Sakho	F	7	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Isaac Johnson	C	8	0-3	0-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	0
Nigel Burris	F	5	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Landon Brenchley	Guard	4	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Jackson Grant	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Zach Edey	Center	27	8-11	0-0	7-8	14	3	2	3	23
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	25	8-13	0-1	2-4	8	3	1	2	18
Fletcher Loyer	G	31	5-9	1-2	4-4	1	6	0	0	15
Camden Heide	F	15	4-6	1-3	1-1	3	0	0	0	10
Lance Jones	Guard	28	2-7	2-5	3-4	3	4	1	0	9
Myles Colvin	G	14	3-5	3-5	0-0	3	1	0	0	9
Mason Gillis	Forward	16	2-3	2-3	0-0	3	2	0	0	6
Braden Smith	G	22	2-7	1-2	0-0	4	6	1	0	5
Brian Waddell	F	5	2-2	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	5
William Berg	C	3	1-1	0-0	2-2	4	1	0	0	4
Sam King	F	1	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Caleb Furst	Forward	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Ethan Morton	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	2	0	0	0
Chase Martin	Guard	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Carson Barrett	Guard	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.8Possessions73.8

90.8Offensive Efficiency143.6

143.6Defensive Efficiency90.8

-52.8Net Efficiency52.8

43.0%Effective FG%64.0%

46.8%True Shooting %67.2%

11.0%Turnover Rate12.0%

25.0%Free Throw Rate33.8%

42.2%3-Point Rate33.8%

1.13Assist / Turnover3.22

Game Summary

Purdue won by 39 points. The game played at approximately 73.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.