Clemson logo

Clemson

24-10
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
40.2%Clemson
59.8%Baylor
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBaylor -3.0
PROJECTED TOTAL147.9
MODEL MONEYLINEBaylor -149
Baylor logo

Baylor

16-17
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreClemson 72
Projected Total147.9
Projected ScoreBaylor 75

Team Comparison

59.9MMH Power Index58.9
112.6Offensive Efficiency116.7
101.4Defensive Efficiency109.5
11.2Net Efficiency7.2
4.6Strength of Schedule4.0
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.2
63.6Tempo69.7
53.0%Effective FG%54.4%
14.0%Turnover Rate16.4%
27.0%Offensive Rebound %37.5%
38.1%Free Throw Rate34.8%
7.2Average Margin5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY59.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–58.9), defensive efficiency (101.4–109.5), net efficiency (11.2–7.2), strength of schedule (4.6–4.0).
Baylor COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (116.7–112.6), recent form (-2.2–-4.7), shooting efficiency (54.4–53.0).
Final
Clemson logo
Clemson
72—64
Baylor logo
Baylor
Clemson by 8 • 65.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATBaylor
23-47FG21-54
48.9%FG%38.9%
6-173PT6-24
35.3%3PT%25.0%
20-24FT16-26
83.3%FT%61.5%
32Rebounds33
3Offensive Rebounds11
16Assists7
11Turnovers10
4Steals8
4Blocks2
21Fouls16

Player Box Score

Clemson
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chase HunterGuard395-103-57-826200020
Joseph Girard IIIGuard354-91-54-433100013
Ian SchieffelinForward294-61-22-463010011
PJ HallCenter194-110-13-431010011
RJ GodfreyF192-40-04-45100008
Jack ClarkForward343-51-30-08111007
Chauncey WigginsF191-20-10-01101002
Dillon HunterG60-00-00-01000000
Baylor
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
RayJ DennisGuard399-212-107-862300027
Ja'Kobe WalterGuard376-133-95-1161100020
Jalen BridgesForward383-41-23-451000010
Jayden NunnGuard321-80-31-23230003
Josh OjianwunaF211-10-00-03011002
Yves MissiCenter191-40-00-14001002
Caleb LohnerForward120-30-00-03100000
Miro LittleG20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

65.9Possessions65.9
109.3Offensive Efficiency97.1
97.1Defensive Efficiency109.3
12.1Net Efficiency-12.1
55.3%Effective FG%44.4%
61.6%True Shooting %48.2%
16.6%Turnover Rate15.3%
51.1%Free Throw Rate48.1%
36.2%3-Point Rate44.4%
1.45Assist / Turnover0.70
Game Summary
Clemson won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 65.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, True Shooting %, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.