
Clemson
24-10GAME THAT MATTERSAT
40.2%Clemson
59.8%Baylor
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBaylor -3.0
PROJECTED TOTAL147.9
MODEL MONEYLINEBaylor -149

Baylor
16-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreClemson 72
Projected Total147.9
Projected ScoreBaylor 75
Team Comparison
59.9MMH Power Index58.9
112.6Offensive Efficiency116.7
101.4Defensive Efficiency109.5
11.2Net Efficiency7.2
4.6Strength of Schedule4.0
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.2
63.6Tempo69.7
53.0%Effective FG%54.4%
14.0%Turnover Rate16.4%
27.0%Offensive Rebound %37.5%
38.1%Free Throw Rate34.8%
7.2Average Margin5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Clemson HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–58.9), defensive efficiency (101.4–109.5), net efficiency (11.2–7.2), strength of schedule (4.6–4.0).
Baylor COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (116.7–112.6), recent form (-2.2–-4.7), shooting efficiency (54.4–53.0).