
Grand Canyon
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.9%Grand Canyon
83.1%Alabama
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAlabama -9.9
PROJECTED TOTAL163.0
MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama -492

Alabama
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 77
Projected Total163.0
Projected ScoreAlabama 86
Team Comparison
59.8MMH Power Index69.5
109.2Offensive Efficiency121.6
99.1Defensive Efficiency111.2
10.1Net Efficiency10.4
2.0Strength of Schedule9.4
9.7Last 10 Net Efficiency9.5
69.3Tempo74.7
52.1%Effective FG%54.9%
17.6%Turnover Rate13.0%
31.2%Offensive Rebound %32.1%
41.0%Free Throw Rate36.9%
7.0Average Margin7.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Alabama HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY83.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–59.8), offensive efficiency (121.6–109.2), net efficiency (10.4–10.1), strength of schedule (9.4–2.0).
Grand Canyon COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (99.1–111.2), recent form (9.7–9.5), free throw rate (41.0–36.9).