Clemson

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

6.1%Clemson

93.9%Arizona

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADArizona -18.3

PROJECTED TOTAL146.7

MODEL MONEYLINEArizona -1539

Arizona

36-3

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreClemson 64

Projected Total146.7

Projected ScoreArizona 83

Team Comparison

ClemsonMetricArizona

59.9MMH Power Index79.9

112.6Offensive Efficiency120.3

101.4Defensive Efficiency96.9

11.2Net Efficiency23.4

4.6Strength of Schedule8.0

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency17.0

63.6Tempo71.6

53.0%Effective FG%55.0%

14.0%Turnover Rate15.1%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %37.8%

38.1%Free Throw Rate45.3%

7.2Average Margin16.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Arizona HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY93.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMArizona holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (79.9–59.9), offensive efficiency (120.3–112.6), defensive efficiency (96.9–101.4), net efficiency (23.4–11.2).

Clemson COUNTERS WITHball security (14.0–15.1).

Final

Clemson

77—72

Arizona

Clemson by 5 • 70.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATArizona

29-59FG25-67

49.2%FG%37.3%

8-253PT5-28

32.0%3PT%17.9%

11-16FT17-25

68.8%FT%68.0%

36Rebounds44

6Offensive Rebounds17

17Assists14

10Turnovers9

4Steals8

2Blocks4

19Fouls16

Player Box Score

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chase Hunter	Guard	35	8-15	0-5	2-3	7	5	1	1	18
PJ Hall	Center	31	7-15	1-5	2-3	8	0	1	0	17
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	36	5-12	2-5	2-2	7	3	2	1	14
Chauncey Wiggins	F	11	3-4	2-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	8
Jack Clark	Forward	30	2-3	1-1	2-2	4	2	0	0	7
RJ Godfrey	F	11	2-3	1-1	2-2	1	0	0	0	7
Joseph Girard III	Guard	32	1-5	1-5	1-3	4	6	0	0	4
Dillon Hunter	G	14	1-2	0-1	0-1	2	1	0	0	2

Arizona

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaden Bradley	G	25	4-9	2-4	8-9	4	3	1	2	18
Oumar Ballo	Center	29	7-10	0-0	1-7	15	1	0	1	15
Caleb Love	Guard	35	5-18	0-9	3-3	2	1	2	0	13
Pelle Larsson	Guard	37	2-9	1-6	3-4	2	4	1	0	8
KJ Lewis	G	13	2-6	1-1	2-2	2	1	1	0	7
Keshad Johnson	Forward	31	3-8	0-3	0-0	11	3	1	0	6
Kylan Boswell	G	21	1-6	1-5	0-0	2	1	2	0	3
Motiejus Krivas	C	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	1	2

Advanced Game Stats

70.8Possessions70.8

108.8Offensive Efficiency101.7

101.7Defensive Efficiency108.8

7.1Net Efficiency-7.1

55.9%Effective FG%41.0%

57.8%True Shooting %45.6%

14.2%Turnover Rate12.7%

27.1%Free Throw Rate37.3%

42.4%3-Point Rate41.8%

1.70Assist / Turnover1.56

Game Summary

Clemson won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 70.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.