
Creighton
15-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.5%Creighton
92.5%Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -17.1
PROJECTED TOTAL151.3
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -1233

Tennessee
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCreighton 67
Projected Total151.3
Projected ScoreTennessee 84
Team Comparison
50.6MMH Power Index68.6
109.0Offensive Efficiency115.8
109.5Defensive Efficiency102.1
-0.5Net Efficiency13.7
5.1Strength of Schedule7.8
-5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
68.9Tempo68.1
53.0%Effective FG%51.6%
16.6%Turnover Rate17.3%
26.6%Offensive Rebound %44.5%
29.0%Free Throw Rate38.6%
-0.3Average Margin9.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY92.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–50.6), offensive efficiency (115.8–109.0), defensive efficiency (102.1–109.5), net efficiency (13.7–-0.5).
Creighton COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.0–51.6), ball security (16.6–17.3).