
Tennessee
25-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.5%Tennessee
73.5%Purdue
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPurdue -6.5
PROJECTED TOTAL152.5
MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -277

Purdue
30-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTennessee 73
Projected Total152.5
Projected ScorePurdue 79
Team Comparison
68.6MMH Power Index73.2
115.8Offensive Efficiency124.8
102.1Defensive Efficiency107.8
13.7Net Efficiency17.0
7.8Strength of Schedule7.6
3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8
68.1Tempo65.4
51.6%Effective FG%57.8%
17.3%Turnover Rate13.7%
44.5%Offensive Rebound %36.2%
38.6%Free Throw Rate29.1%
9.3Average Margin11.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Purdue HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–68.6), offensive efficiency (124.8–115.8), net efficiency (17.0–13.7), recent form (11.8–3.3).
Tennessee COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.1–107.8), strength of schedule (7.8–7.6), offensive rebounding (44.5–36.2).