Creighton

15-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

39.9%Creighton

60.1%Notre Dame

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNotre Dame -3.4

PROJECTED TOTAL152.7

MODEL MONEYLINENotre Dame -151

Notre Dame

13-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCreighton 75

Projected Total152.7

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 78

Team Comparison

CreightonMetricNotre Dame

50.6MMH Power Index49.7

109.0Offensive Efficiency110.3

109.5Defensive Efficiency111.2

-0.5Net Efficiency-0.9

5.1Strength of Schedule4.7

-5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6

68.9Tempo68.0

53.0%Effective FG%53.0%

16.6%Turnover Rate17.0%

26.6%Offensive Rebound %31.4%

29.0%Free Throw Rate34.7%

-0.3Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Creighton HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCreighton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.6–49.7), defensive efficiency (109.5–111.2), net efficiency (-0.5–-0.9), strength of schedule (5.1–4.7).

Notre Dame COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.3–109.0), offensive rebounding (31.4–26.6), free throw rate (34.7–29.0).

Final

Creighton

80—76

Notre Dame

Creighton by 4 • 70.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

CreightonTEAM STATNotre Dame

28-57FG28-65

49.0%FG%43.0%

11-243PT9-23

46.0%3PT%39.0%

13-15FT11-15

87.0%FT%73.0%

32Rebounds37

5Offensive Rebounds12

19Assists14

12Turnovers9

4Steals6

7Blocks3

13Fouls16

Player Box Score

Creighton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jamiya Neal	Guard	37	7-17	4-6	3-4	9	4	1	2	21
Steven Ashworth	Guard	36	4-11	3-8	4-4	1	6	1	0	15
Fred King	C	26	6-10	0-0	2-3	5	1	1	4	14
Isaac Traudt	F	23	2-2	2-2	2-2	6	1	0	0	8
Pop Isaacs	G	26	2-5	0-2	2-2	3	5	1	0	6
Jasen Green	F	14	2-3	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	1	4
Ty Davis	G	9	2-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Jackson McAndrew	F	16	1-2	1-2	0-0	4	0	0	0	3
Mason Miller	F	3	1-4	1-4	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Shane Thomas	G	10	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Braeden Shrewsberry	G	38	7-18	2-7	1-2	4	1	2	0	17
Tae Davis	F	34	5-15	1-3	6-9	2	5	1	0	17
Matt Allocco	Guard	40	4-9	0-2	4-4	3	4	1	0	12
Garrett Sundra	F	11	4-5	3-4	0-0	4	1	0	0	11
J.R. Konieczny	F	19	3-6	2-4	0-0	5	0	0	1	8
Kebba Njie	F	20	3-7	1-2	0-0	6	1	0	1	7
Logan Imes	G	12	1-4	0-1	0-0	3	1	0	0	2
Nikita Konstantynovskyi	Forward	4	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Julian Roper II	Guard	17	0-0	0-0	0-0	4	1	2	1	0
Cole Certa	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Burke Chebuhar	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.1Possessions70.1

114.1Offensive Efficiency108.4

108.4Defensive Efficiency114.1

5.7Net Efficiency-5.7

58.8%Effective FG%50.0%

62.4%True Shooting %52.7%

16.9%Turnover Rate13.0%

26.3%Free Throw Rate23.1%

42.1%3-Point Rate35.4%

1.58Assist / Turnover1.56

Game Summary

Creighton won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 70.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, True Shooting %, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.