Air Force logo

Air Force

3-29
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
1.0%Air Force
99.0%Miami (OH)
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMiami (OH) -33.6
PROJECTED TOTAL155.8
MODEL MONEYLINEMiami (OH) -9900
Miami (OH) logo

Miami (OH)

32-2
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAir Force 61
Projected Total155.8
Projected ScoreMiami (OH) 95

Team Comparison

23MMH Power Index60.7
91.3Offensive Efficiency123.1
118.5Defensive Efficiency103.7
-27.2Net Efficiency19.4
6.2Strength of Schedule-5.6
-33.5Last 10 Net Efficiency5.5
67.4Tempo72.8
49.0%Effective FG%60.6%
21.9%Turnover Rate14.2%
21.4%Offensive Rebound %26.3%
35.9%Free Throw Rate40.1%
-18.3Average Margin14.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Miami (OH) HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY99.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami (OH) holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (60.7–23.0), offensive efficiency (123.1–91.3), defensive efficiency (103.7–118.5), net efficiency (19.4–-27.2).
Air Force COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (6.2–-5.6).
Final
Air Force logo
Air Force
60—73
Miami (OH) logo
Miami (OH)
Miami (OH) by 13 • 62.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Air ForceTEAM STATMiami (OH)
23-47FG30-53
49.0%FG%57.0%
10-223PT4-13
45.0%3PT%31.0%
4-13FT9-15
31.0%FT%60.0%
23Rebounds32
4Offensive Rebounds7
14Assists12
13Turnovers9
5Steals7
3Blocks2
12Fouls14

Player Box Score

Air Force
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Luke KearneyF336-124-80-041000016
Ethan TaylorGuard394-133-81-125210012
Caleb WalkerF255-60-01-522010011
Jeffrey MillsGuard353-52-30-05300008
Kyle MarshallG202-51-12-41011007
Byron BrownGuard242-40-10-23310004
Wesley CelichowskiC151-10-00-10000002
Will CooperF50-10-10-00010000
Sam DuskinGuard40-00-00-00000000
Miami (OH)
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Peter SuderG3817-213-45-932310042
Eian ElmerG354-90-41-27011009
Luke SkaljacG123-31-10-00000007
Reece PotterF173-50-10-02100006
Antwone WoolfolkF232-50-00-04020004
Mekhi CooperG251-30-01-26600003
Evan IpsaroG170-00-02-20300002
Kam CraftG260-70-30-04010000
Brant ByersG40-00-00-00000000
Dan LuersGuard30-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

62.2Possessions62.2
96.5Offensive Efficiency117.4
117.4Defensive Efficiency96.5
-20.9Net Efficiency20.9
59.6%Effective FG%60.4%
56.4%True Shooting %60.7%
20.9%Turnover Rate14.5%
27.7%Free Throw Rate28.3%
46.8%3-Point Rate24.5%
1.08Assist / Turnover1.33
Game Summary
Miami (OH) won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 62.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.