
UT Arlington
18-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
82.8%UT Arlington
17.2%UL Monroe
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Arlington -11.1
PROJECTED TOTAL147.5
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Arlington -481

UL Monroe
4-28MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Arlington 79
Projected Total147.5
Projected ScoreUL Monroe 68
Team Comparison
49.6MMH Power Index30.9
102.7Offensive Efficiency101.1
97.9Defensive Efficiency117.1
4.8Net Efficiency-16.0
-0.8Strength of Schedule-1.0
-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.2
68.1Tempo71.7
48.5%Effective FG%48.1%
20.4%Turnover Rate16.9%
36.0%Offensive Rebound %25.3%
43.7%Free Throw Rate40.6%
3.3Average Margin-11.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Arlington HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY82.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Arlington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.6–30.9), offensive efficiency (102.7–101.1), defensive efficiency (97.9–117.1), net efficiency (4.8–-16.0).
UL Monroe COUNTERS WITHball security (16.9–20.4).