Kentucky

22-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

48.4%Kentucky

51.6%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -1.8

PROJECTED TOTAL146.2

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -107

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreKentucky 72

Projected Total146.2

Projected ScoreClemson 74

Team Comparison

KentuckyMetricClemson

63.9MMH Power Index59.9

115.2Offensive Efficiency112.6

106.3Defensive Efficiency101.4

8.9Net Efficiency11.2

8.7Strength of Schedule4.6

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

69.9Tempo63.6

53.2%Effective FG%53.0%

15.4%Turnover Rate14.0%

33.2%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

38.0%Free Throw Rate38.1%

6.2Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Kentucky HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKentucky holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–59.9), offensive efficiency (115.2–112.6), strength of schedule (8.7–4.6), recent form (-1.0–-4.7).

Clemson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.4–106.3), net efficiency (11.2–8.9), ball security (14.0–15.4).

Final

Kentucky

66—70

Clemson

Clemson by 4 • 67.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

KentuckyTEAM STATClemson

24-63FG24-65

38.0%FG%37.0%

7-273PT8-25

26.0%3PT%32.0%

11-18FT14-19

61.0%FT%74.0%

44Rebounds44

15Offensive Rebounds15

11Assists13

12Turnovers8

6Steals6

6Blocks9

20Fouls15

Player Box Score

Kentucky

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Otega Oweh	G	31	5-13	1-5	6-8	7	0	1	0	17
Lamont Butler	Guard	19	6-9	2-4	2-3	2	5	1	0	16
Jaxson Robinson	Guard	35	5-13	2-7	0-0	4	0	0	1	12
Amari Williams	Center	28	4-8	0-0	1-2	11	2	1	3	9
Andrew Carr	Forward	24	1-7	1-3	2-4	5	2	0	2	5
Koby Brea	Guard	17	1-3	1-2	0-0	2	2	0	0	3
Ansley Almonor	Forward	13	1-4	0-2	0-0	0	0	2	0	2
Brandon Garrison	F	12	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Kerr Kriisa	G	21	0-4	0-4	0-1	2	0	1	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaeden Zackery	Not Available	37	5-12	2-4	1-2	1	2	4	0	13
Chauncey Wiggins	F	27	4-7	2-3	2-2	4	1	0	1	12
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	36	4-20	1-8	2-3	20	4	0	1	11
Chase Hunter	Guard	31	2-8	0-4	6-6	3	2	1	0	10
Viktor Lakhin	Center	22	3-6	1-3	2-2	6	2	0	4	9
Myles Foster	Forward	9	3-4	1-1	0-2	4	0	0	1	7
Dillon Hunter	G	26	2-3	1-1	1-2	2	2	1	1	6
Del Jones	G	11	1-4	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Christian Reeves	C	1	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.8Possessions67.8

97.3Offensive Efficiency103.2

103.2Defensive Efficiency97.3

-5.9Net Efficiency5.9

43.7%Effective FG%43.1%

46.1%True Shooting %47.3%

17.5%Turnover Rate11.9%

28.6%Free Throw Rate29.2%

42.9%3-Point Rate38.5%

0.92Assist / Turnover1.63

Game Summary

Clemson won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 67.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.