Army logo

Army

11-21
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
40.5%Army
59.5%Bucknell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBucknell -2.9
PROJECTED TOTAL147.7
MODEL MONEYLINEBucknell -147
Bucknell logo

Bucknell

10-23
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreArmy 72
Projected Total147.7
Projected ScoreBucknell 75

Team Comparison

36.8MMH Power Index35.7
104.8Offensive Efficiency99.5
112.1Defensive Efficiency112.8
-7.3Net Efficiency-13.3
-3.3Strength of Schedule2.0
-10.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.5
68.9Tempo67.7
49.8%Effective FG%48.4%
17.3%Turnover Rate19.0%
31.0%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
26.5%Free Throw Rate30.7%
-5.1Average Margin-8.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Army HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY59.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMArmy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (36.8–35.7), offensive efficiency (104.8–99.5), defensive efficiency (112.1–112.8), net efficiency (-7.3–-13.3).
Bucknell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.0–-3.3), free throw rate (30.7–26.5).
Final
Army logo
Army
5565
Bucknell logo
Bucknell
Bucknell by 1066.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ArmyTEAM STATBucknell
21-67FG25-53
31.0%FG%47.0%
5-423PT4-21
12.0%3PT%19.0%
8-11FT11-18
73.0%FT%61.0%
36Rebounds36
16Offensive Rebounds8
11Assists8
12Turnovers12
7Steals7
4Blocks
20Fouls14

Player Box Score

Army
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jaxson BellG304-110-56-661210014
Ryan CurryG374-141-110-06330009
Jacen HollowayF354-91-40-23100009
Jorn EversonF184-100-50-13101008
Jackson MayoG252-92-90-06100006
Tate LaczkowskiF232-40-12-25110006
Joshua EliF61-11-10-00000003
Dylan BennerF110-10-10-02202000
Jackson FurmanG110-80-50-02100000
Dillon WattG30-00-00-00010000
Dylan MuransF10-00-00-00000000
Bucknell
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Pat CurtinG389-202-84-692300024
Achile SpadoneG408-120-33-551100019
Amon DörriesC406-111-34-531000017
Aleksander PachuckiG322-51-30-06200005
Jayden WilliamsG390-50-40-24230000
Quin BergerG100-00-00-01000000
Jacob MeachemG10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.9Possessions66.9
82.2Offensive Efficiency97.2
97.2Defensive Efficiency82.2
-14.9Net Efficiency14.9
35.1%Effective FG%50.9%
38.1%True Shooting %52.8%
17.6%Turnover Rate18.3%
16.4%Free Throw Rate34.0%
62.7%3-Point Rate39.6%
0.92Assist / Turnover0.67
Game Summary
Bucknell won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 66.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.