
Fairleigh Dickinson
11-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.2%Fairleigh Dickinson
78.8%Mercyhurst
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMercyhurst -9.3
PROJECTED TOTAL135.8
MODEL MONEYLINEMercyhurst -372

Mercyhurst
17-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFairleigh Dickinson 63
Projected Total135.8
Projected ScoreMercyhurst 73
Team Comparison
38.3MMH Power Index45.5
103.8Offensive Efficiency105.2
108.4Defensive Efficiency102.2
-4.6Net Efficiency3.0
-5.8Strength of Schedule-5.7
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2
64.7Tempo65.9
48.6%Effective FG%50.5%
18.2%Turnover Rate14.4%
33.6%Offensive Rebound %26.8%
33.1%Free Throw Rate25.4%
-3.0Average Margin2.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Mercyhurst HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMercyhurst holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.5–38.3), offensive efficiency (105.2–103.8), defensive efficiency (102.2–108.4), net efficiency (3.0–-4.6).
Fairleigh Dickinson COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.6–26.8), free throw rate (33.1–25.4).