
Cleveland State
11-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.2%Cleveland State
93.8%Wright State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWright State -18.5
PROJECTED TOTAL164.4
MODEL MONEYLINEWright State -1513

Wright State
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCleveland State 73
Projected Total164.4
Projected ScoreWright State 91
Team Comparison
37.3MMH Power Index57.1
111.6Offensive Efficiency116.4
120.2Defensive Efficiency106.5
-8.6Net Efficiency9.9
-1.7Strength of Schedule-2.0
-14.6Last 10 Net Efficiency7.0
71.5Tempo69.2
55.0%Effective FG%55.2%
18.0%Turnover Rate16.1%
28.6%Offensive Rebound %33.9%
38.7%Free Throw Rate38.3%
-6.2Average Margin6.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Wright State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY93.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWright State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.1–37.3), offensive efficiency (116.4–111.6), defensive efficiency (106.5–120.2), net efficiency (9.9–-8.6).
Cleveland State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.7–-2.0), free throw rate (38.7–38.3).