Bucknell

10-23

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

5.4%Bucknell

94.6%Navy

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNavy -19.7

PROJECTED TOTAL141.2

MODEL MONEYLINENavy -1752

Navy

26-8

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBucknell 61

Projected Total141.2

Projected ScoreNavy 80

Team Comparison

BucknellMetricNavy

35.7MMH Power Index56.8

99.5Offensive Efficiency113.2

112.8Defensive Efficiency97.6

-13.3Net Efficiency15.6

2.0Strength of Schedule-8.1

-11.5Last 10 Net Efficiency16.4

67.7Tempo65.9

48.4%Effective FG%53.7%

19.0%Turnover Rate17.1%

26.6%Offensive Rebound %33.2%

30.7%Free Throw Rate40.9%

-8.9Average Margin10.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Navy HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY94.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNavy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.8–35.7), offensive efficiency (113.2–99.5), defensive efficiency (97.6–112.8), net efficiency (15.6–-13.3).

Bucknell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.0–-8.1).

Final

Bucknell

69—74

Navy

Navy by 5 • 62.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BucknellTEAM STATNavy

26-61FG24-47

43.0%FG%51.0%

11-293PT11-23

38.0%3PT%48.0%

6-6FT15-20

100.0%FT%75.0%

33Rebounds28

14Offensive Rebounds7

16Assists19

13Turnovers13

7Steals9

—Blocks7

16Fouls8

Player Box Score

Bucknell

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Achile Spadone	G	40	7-15	4-6	2-2	7	2	2	20
Amon Dörries	C	40	8-14	0-2	2-2	5	4	1	18
Aleksander Pachucki	G	38	4-10	3-9	0-0	6	2	1	11
Pat Curtin	G	27	4-8	2-4	0-0	7	2	0	10
Jayden Williams	G	38	1-10	1-5	2-2	6	5	2	5
Quin Berger	G	15	2-4	1-3	0-0	0	0	1	5
Jacob Meachem	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0

Navy

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Cam Cole	G	24	5-10	4-8	2-2	5	2	2	3	16
Austin Benigni	G	40	4-8	2-3	4-4	4	3	2	0	14
Jinwoo Kim	G	30	5-8	4-7	0-0	4	3	0	1	14
Jordan Pennick	G	26	2-7	1-4	7-8	2	4	1	0	12
Mike Woods	F	22	6-8	0-0	0-1	2	3	1	0	12
Aidan Kehoe	C	35	2-3	0-0	2-5	7	3	1	2	6
Donovan Draper	F	23	0-3	0-1	0-0	3	1	2	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.7Possessions62.7

110.0Offensive Efficiency118.0

118.0Defensive Efficiency110.0

-8.0Net Efficiency8.0

51.6%Effective FG%62.8%

54.0%True Shooting %65.5%

20.7%Turnover Rate20.8%

9.8%Free Throw Rate42.6%

47.5%3-Point Rate48.9%

1.23Assist / Turnover1.46

Game Summary

Navy won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 62.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.