VMI logo

VMI

5-26
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.8%VMI
92.2%UNC Greensboro
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNC Greensboro -14.9
PROJECTED TOTAL155.9
MODEL MONEYLINEUNC Greensboro -1182
UNC Greensboro logo

UNC Greensboro

15-19
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreVMI 70
Projected Total155.9
Projected ScoreUNC Greensboro 85

Team Comparison

29.1MMH Power Index46.7
105.1Offensive Efficiency112.6
117.4Defensive Efficiency115.3
-12.3Net Efficiency-2.7
-5.4Strength of Schedule-1.9
-21.9Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
66.2Tempo69.8
48.9%Effective FG%52.8%
14.7%Turnover Rate14.6%
26.4%Offensive Rebound %28.7%
29.9%Free Throw Rate41.7%
-8.2Average Margin-1.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UNC Greensboro HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
110
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNC Greensboro holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.7–29.1), offensive efficiency (112.6–105.1), defensive efficiency (115.3–117.4), net efficiency (-2.7–-12.3).
Final
VMI logo
VMI
7084
UNC Greensboro logo
UNC Greensboro
UNC Greensboro by 1467.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VMITEAM STATUNC Greensboro
25-60FG34-68
42.0%FG%50.0%
10-303PT6-23
33.0%3PT%26.0%
10-15FT10-10
67.0%FT%100.0%
29Rebounds40
10Offensive Rebounds15
13Assists19
11Turnovers9
5Steals6
2Blocks3
13Fouls13

Player Box Score

VMI
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Linus HolmstromG309-156-110-022300024
TJ JohnsonF406-143-90-081000015
Tan YildizogluG394-141-34-634100013
Kaden StuckeyF334-70-04-6100110012
Mario Tatum Jr.G302-70-42-32400006
Cal ListonF170-10-10-00201000
Walker AndrewsG110-20-20-01000000
UNC Greensboro
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
KJ YoungerG2810-163-76-673000029
Justin NeelyF226-110-22-2102010014
Donald Whitehead Jr.G295-151-62-225100013
Domas KauzonasF113-40-00-04101006
Lilian MarvilleG332-61-20-02530005
Noah NorgaardG192-51-40-02000005
Valentino PinedoF272-30-00-06201004
Clinton EfindaF162-50-10-02110004
Clyde Bailey IIG121-20-10-00010002
Assane MandianG31-10-00-02000002

Advanced Game Stats

67.4Possessions67.4
103.9Offensive Efficiency124.6
124.6Defensive Efficiency103.9
-20.8Net Efficiency20.8
50.0%Effective FG%54.4%
52.1%True Shooting %57.7%
16.1%Turnover Rate13.5%
25.0%Free Throw Rate14.7%
50.0%3-Point Rate33.8%
1.18Assist / Turnover2.11
Game Summary
UNC Greensboro won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 67.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.