
Stonehill
12-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
20.5%Stonehill
79.5%Mercyhurst
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMercyhurst -9.1
PROJECTED TOTAL134.4
MODEL MONEYLINEMercyhurst -388

Mercyhurst
17-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStonehill 63
Projected Total134.4
Projected ScoreMercyhurst 72
Team Comparison
37.9MMH Power Index45.5
97.5Offensive Efficiency105.2
100.7Defensive Efficiency102.2
-3.2Net Efficiency3.0
-5.4Strength of Schedule-5.7
-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2
68.1Tempo65.9
48.0%Effective FG%50.5%
19.1%Turnover Rate14.4%
28.4%Offensive Rebound %26.8%
29.2%Free Throw Rate25.4%
-2.2Average Margin2.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Mercyhurst HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY79.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMercyhurst holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.5–37.9), offensive efficiency (105.2–97.5), net efficiency (3.0–-3.2), recent form (3.2–-3.4).
Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–102.2), strength of schedule (-5.4–-5.7), offensive rebounding (28.4–26.8).