
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.8%Queens University
70.2%Austin Peay
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAustin Peay -7.8
PROJECTED TOTAL166.3
MODEL MONEYLINEAustin Peay -236

Austin Peay
22-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 79
Projected Total166.3
Projected ScoreAustin Peay 87
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index54.8
118.4Offensive Efficiency115.0
117.0Defensive Efficiency103.1
1.4Net Efficiency11.9
0.1Strength of Schedule-5.8
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency8.1
71.4Tempo71.0
56.6%Effective FG%53.9%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.3%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %30.3%
37.6%Free Throw Rate39.0%
0.9Average Margin8.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Austin Peay HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAustin Peay holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.8–51.7), defensive efficiency (103.1–117.0), net efficiency (11.9–1.4), recent form (8.1–1.5).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.4–115.0), strength of schedule (0.1–-5.8), shooting efficiency (56.6–53.9).