Queens University logo

Queens University

21-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
31.7%Queens University
68.3%Central Arkansas
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCentral Arkansas -6.9
PROJECTED TOTAL166.7
MODEL MONEYLINECentral Arkansas -215
Central Arkansas logo

Central Arkansas

22-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 80
Projected Total166.7
Projected ScoreCentral Arkansas 87

Team Comparison

51.7MMH Power Index54
118.4Offensive Efficiency113.9
117.0Defensive Efficiency105.2
1.4Net Efficiency8.7
0.1Strength of Schedule-3.9
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency9.8
71.4Tempo71.0
56.6%Effective FG%54.3%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.3%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
37.6%Free Throw Rate30.7%
0.9Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

EVEN MATCHUP

WIN PROBABILITY68.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
5–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNo clear statistical separation
Final
Queens University logo
Queens University
98—93
Central Arkansas logo
Central Arkansas
Queens University by 5 • 80.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Queens UniversityTEAM STATCentral Arkansas
30-65FG32-75
46.0%FG%43.0%
16-383PT15-36
42.0%3PT%42.0%
22-27FT14-20
81.0%FT%70.0%
45Rebounds35
16Offensive Rebounds15
19Assists17
18Turnovers11
7Steals13
4Blocks5
18Fouls21

Player Box Score

Queens University
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chris AshbyG4310-1910-194-444100034
Jordan WatfordG297-90-05-646000019
Nasir MannG304-102-64-792300014
Yoav BermanG392-31-15-674010010
Avantae ParkerF353-100-02-210111008
Carson SchwiegerF242-102-90-00012006
Maban JabrielF201-31-32-26210005
Gus LarsonF51-10-00-01000002
Central Arkansas
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Camren HunterG3917-308-127-813410049
Ty RobinsonG366-103-41-162320016
Javion Guy-KingG283-111-53-475000010
Cole McCormickF322-81-62-57021007
Malchiah MarableF242-50-00-05301004
Harry BeauchampG161-31-31-21100004
Truman ByrneF81-41-40-03010003
Luke MooreG330-30-20-04320000
Tyler LeeG90-10-00-00010000

Advanced Game Stats

80.2Possessions80.2
122.2Offensive Efficiency116.0
116.0Defensive Efficiency122.2
6.2Net Efficiency-6.2
58.5%Effective FG%52.7%
63.0%True Shooting %55.0%
22.5%Turnover Rate13.7%
41.5%Free Throw Rate26.7%
58.5%3-Point Rate48.0%
1.06Assist / Turnover1.55
Game Summary
Queens University won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 80.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.