
Marist
19-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
30.8%Marist
69.2%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -4.4
PROJECTED TOTAL132.5
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -225

Merrimack
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMarist 64
Projected Total132.5
Projected ScoreMerrimack 68
Team Comparison
51MMH Power Index53.7
104.3Offensive Efficiency106.4
95.6Defensive Efficiency103.2
8.7Net Efficiency3.2
-3.2Strength of Schedule0.7
2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
66.8Tempo64.4
49.9%Effective FG%49.3%
16.8%Turnover Rate14.8%
29.4%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
26.1%Free Throw Rate39.5%
5.8Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–51.0), offensive efficiency (106.4–104.3), strength of schedule (0.7–-3.2), recent form (12.9–2.9).
Marist COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (95.6–103.2), net efficiency (8.7–3.2), shooting efficiency (49.9–49.3).