Mississippi Valley State

3-30

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

4.1%Mississippi Valley State

95.9%Grambling

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrambling -22.2

PROJECTED TOTAL144.4

MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -2339

Grambling

14-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 61

Projected Total144.4

Projected ScoreGrambling 83

Team Comparison

Mississippi Valley StateMetricGrambling

17.7MMH Power Index41.4

91.1Offensive Efficiency100.7

117.8Defensive Efficiency100.4

-26.7Net Efficiency0.3

-4.1Strength of Schedule-5.7

-17.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4

70.5Tempo69.9

45.8%Effective FG%49.2%

21.8%Turnover Rate20.9%

26.5%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

34.5%Free Throw Rate42.2%

-18.8Average Margin0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–17.7), offensive efficiency (100.7–91.1), defensive efficiency (100.4–117.8), net efficiency (0.3–-26.7).

Mississippi Valley State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-4.1–-5.7).

Final

Mississippi Valley State

52—77

Grambling

Grambling by 25 • 66.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Mississippi Valley StateTEAM STATGrambling

18-52FG24-55

35.0%FG%44.0%

5-153PT13-24

33.0%3PT%54.0%

11-17FT16-24

65.0%FT%67.0%

35Rebounds36

13Offensive Rebounds11

14Assists15

18Turnovers12

10Steals7

3Blocks4

16Fouls17

Player Box Score

Mississippi Valley State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Michael James	G	29	7-16	4-7	5-6	7	4	3	0	23
Lamont Sams	F	24	2-5	0-1	5-6	3	2	2	1	9
George Ivory III	G	11	2-3	1-1	0-0	0	0	1	1	5
Mussa Mzein	C	12	2-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	4
Jonathan Pace	F	2	2-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Xzayvion Childress	G	26	1-5	0-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	2
X'Zaevion Barnett	G	25	1-4	0-1	0-2	2	3	2	0	2
Daniel Mayfield	F	21	1-7	0-1	0-0	0	1	1	1	2
Patrick Punch	G	31	0-5	0-2	1-2	5	1	0	0	1
Samuel Murray	F	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	5	1	0	0	0
Chance Sutton	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-1	3	1	0	0	0
Tyrone Iroghama	G	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jamil Muttilib	G	33	6-12	5-8	5-7	4	1	1	0	22
Derrius Ward	G	25	4-5	3-4	4-7	2	7	1	0	15
Roderick Coffee III	F	27	3-8	3-5	0-0	3	5	2	1	9
Mekhi Fitts	F	9	3-3	1-1	2-2	0	0	0	0	9
Jimel Lane	F	20	4-9	0-3	0-0	6	1	0	0	8
Antonio Munoz	F	22	2-9	0-0	3-4	4	0	0	1	7
Devyn Franklin	G	23	1-2	0-0	2-4	6	1	1	0	4
Rickey Ballard	F	25	1-3	1-3	0-0	5	0	2	2	3
Richard Amaefule	F	8	0-3	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Chancellor Perkins	G	8	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.3Possessions66.3

78.4Offensive Efficiency116.1

116.1Defensive Efficiency78.4

-37.7Net Efficiency37.7

39.4%Effective FG%55.5%

43.3%True Shooting %58.0%

27.7%Turnover Rate17.8%

32.7%Free Throw Rate43.6%

28.8%3-Point Rate43.6%

0.78Assist / Turnover1.25

Game Summary

Grambling won by 25 points. The game played at approximately 66.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.