Nicholls

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

13.4%Nicholls

86.6%UT Rio Grande Valley

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -12.9

PROJECTED TOTAL147.4

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -646

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNicholls 67

Projected Total147.4

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 80

Team Comparison

NichollsMetricUT Rio Grande Valley

43.6MMH Power Index55.8

105.3Offensive Efficiency112.6

109.0Defensive Efficiency103.1

-3.7Net Efficiency9.5

-0.4Strength of Schedule-1.9

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3

68.7Tempo67.4

51.0%Effective FG%55.7%

17.3%Turnover Rate17.9%

28.5%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

35.3%Free Throw Rate29.6%

-2.5Average Margin6.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–43.6), offensive efficiency (112.6–105.3), defensive efficiency (103.1–109.0), net efficiency (9.5–-3.7).

Nicholls COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.4–-1.9), ball security (17.3–17.9), free throw rate (35.3–29.6).

Final

Nicholls

68—86

UT Rio Grande Valley

UT Rio Grande Valley by 18 • 66.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NichollsTEAM STATUT Rio Grande Valley

24-55FG31-53

44.0%FG%58.0%

5-203PT12-24

25.0%3PT%50.0%

15-17FT12-12

88.0%FT%100.0%

27Rebounds27

10Offensive Rebounds5

11Assists20

14Turnovers13

8Steals6

2Blocks3

15Fouls16

Player Box Score

Nicholls

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trae English	G	34	6-13	0-3	5-5	1	2	2	1	17
Jalin Rice	G	24	5-9	1-2	2-2	3	0	1	0	13
Christian Winborne	G	30	3-11	3-7	2-4	3	0	1	0	11
Jalik Dunkley	G	27	3-7	0-2	2-2	4	2	0	0	8
Sincere Malone	F	22	2-3	0-0	4-4	2	0	0	0	8
Grant Sanders	F	29	3-4	0-0	0-0	12	5	4	1	6
Zee Hamoda	G	12	2-5	1-4	0-0	0	1	0	0	5
Nick Krass	G	13	0-3	0-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Jaylen Searles	G	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Filip Brankovic	F	25	9-12	0-2	3-3	5	3	1	0	21
Koree Cotton	G	33	6-9	4-6	2-2	4	5	2	2	18
Jaylen Washington	G	31	4-11	2-5	5-5	1	5	2	0	15
Marvin McGhee III	G	33	4-7	3-6	2-2	5	1	0	0	13
Julien Gomez	G	31	5-8	2-4	0-0	3	1	1	0	12
Demarris Winters	G	6	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Dane Christensen	F	16	1-3	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	1	2
Kwo Agwa	F	13	1-2	0-0	0-0	6	1	0	0	2
Always Wright	G	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	3	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.9Possessions66.9

101.6Offensive Efficiency128.6

128.6Defensive Efficiency101.6

-26.9Net Efficiency26.9

48.2%Effective FG%69.8%

53.9%True Shooting %73.3%

20.9%Turnover Rate19.5%

30.9%Free Throw Rate22.6%

36.4%3-Point Rate45.3%

0.79Assist / Turnover1.54

Game Summary

UT Rio Grande Valley won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 66.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.