Syracuse logo

Syracuse

15-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.0%Syracuse
84.0%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -10.9
PROJECTED TOTAL158.7
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -525
SMU logo

SMU

20-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSyracuse 74
Projected Total158.7
Projected ScoreSMU 85

Team Comparison

52.2MMH Power Index62.5
109.2Offensive Efficiency118.2
106.6Defensive Efficiency109.6
2.6Net Efficiency8.6
5.6Strength of Schedule7.0
-15.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
69.0Tempo71.1
52.9%Effective FG%55.7%
15.6%Turnover Rate15.7%
29.0%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
36.2%Free Throw Rate31.3%
1.8Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

SMU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
83
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–52.2), offensive efficiency (118.2–109.2), net efficiency (8.6–2.6), strength of schedule (7.0–5.6).
Syracuse COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.6–109.6), ball security (15.6–15.7), free throw rate (36.2–31.3).
Final
Syracuse logo
Syracuse
6986
SMU logo
SMU
SMU by 1766.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

SyracuseTEAM STATSMU
28-64FG34-73
44.0%FG%47.0%
9-343PT11-33
26.0%3PT%33.0%
4-7FT7-8
57.0%FT%88.0%
32Rebounds44
11Offensive Rebounds19
16Assists20
11Turnovers7
5Steals8
3Blocks1
14Fouls10

Player Box Score

Syracuse
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nate KingzG3911-183-100-062110025
Tyler BetseyF295-105-80-070000015
Donnie FreemanF343-91-40-04200007
Sadiq White Jr.F193-40-01-24011007
Naithan GeorgeG382-130-92-331130006
William Kyle IIIF232-20-01-25001005
J.J. StarlingG131-60-20-01100002
Ibrahim SouareF31-10-00-00000002
Bryce ZephirG20-10-10-00000000
SMU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Boopie MillerG369-155-92-274100025
Jaron Pierre Jr.G397-215-172-253210021
Jaden ToombsC338-140-00-0116000016
Corey WashingtonF364-101-63-474200012
Samet YigitogluC356-110-00-0113100012
Jermaine O'Neal Jr.F130-20-10-01020000
Sam WaltersF50-00-00-00000000
B.J. Davis-RayG30-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.1Possessions66.1
104.4Offensive Efficiency130.1
130.1Defensive Efficiency104.4
-25.7Net Efficiency25.7
50.8%Effective FG%54.1%
51.2%True Shooting %56.0%
16.3%Turnover Rate10.8%
10.9%Free Throw Rate11.0%
53.1%3-Point Rate45.2%
1.45Assist / Turnover2.86
Game Summary
SMU won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 66.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.