
Syracuse
15-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.0%Syracuse
84.0%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -10.9
PROJECTED TOTAL158.7
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -525

SMU
20-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSyracuse 74
Projected Total158.7
Projected ScoreSMU 85
Team Comparison
52.2MMH Power Index62.5
109.2Offensive Efficiency118.2
106.6Defensive Efficiency109.6
2.6Net Efficiency8.6
5.6Strength of Schedule7.0
-15.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
69.0Tempo71.1
52.9%Effective FG%55.7%
15.6%Turnover Rate15.7%
29.0%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
36.2%Free Throw Rate31.3%
1.8Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY84.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–52.2), offensive efficiency (118.2–109.2), net efficiency (8.6–2.6), strength of schedule (7.0–5.6).
Syracuse COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.6–109.6), ball security (15.6–15.7), free throw rate (36.2–31.3).