Pittsburgh

13-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

18.6%Pittsburgh

81.4%Stanford

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADStanford -9.7

PROJECTED TOTAL146.5

MODEL MONEYLINEStanford -438

Stanford

20-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePittsburgh 68

Projected Total146.5

Projected ScoreStanford 78

Team Comparison

PittsburghMetricStanford

50.5MMH Power Index59.2

108.4Offensive Efficiency111.6

110.4Defensive Efficiency107.1

-2.0Net Efficiency4.5

5.5Strength of Schedule5.2

-6.9Last 10 Net Efficiency7.4

65.0Tempo68.1

51.4%Effective FG%51.9%

17.3%Turnover Rate15.5%

33.1%Offensive Rebound %32.4%

31.2%Free Throw Rate37.2%

-1.3Average Margin3.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Stanford HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStanford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.2–50.5), offensive efficiency (111.6–108.4), defensive efficiency (107.1–110.4), net efficiency (4.5–-2.0).

Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.5–5.2), offensive rebounding (33.1–32.4).

Final

Pittsburgh

64—63

Stanford

Pittsburgh by 1 • 58.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PittsburghTEAM STATStanford

28-66FG25-52

42.0%FG%48.0%

3-173PT8-20

18.0%3PT%40.0%

5-9FT5-6

56.0%FT%83.0%

41Rebounds28

20Offensive Rebounds7

9Assists9

9Turnovers10

7Steals6

4Blocks8

11Fouls14

Player Box Score

Pittsburgh

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Barry Dunning Jr.	G	40	7-10	2-4	0-0	8	1	3	2	16
Roman Siulepa	F	38	6-14	0-3	2-5	7	1	0	1	14
Cameron Corhen	F	25	5-13	0-0	2-2	7	2	0	0	12
Omari Witherspoon	G	36	5-11	0-1	1-2	6	2	1	0	11
Nojus Indrusaitis	G	11	2-3	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	5
Damarco Minor	G	35	2-10	0-7	0-0	3	2	1	1	4
Macari Moore	G	15	1-5	0-0	0-0	5	1	2	0	2

Stanford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ebuka Okorie	G	35	5-10	1-3	3-3	3	2	1	1	14
Benny Gealer	G	35	4-8	3-6	0-0	4	1	2	0	11
AJ Rohosy	F	22	4-8	0-0	2-3	7	2	0	0	10
Ryan Agarwal	G	16	3-4	3-4	0-0	2	0	0	2	9
Oskar Giltay	F	18	3-3	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	1	6
Jaylen Thompson	F	24	2-6	1-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	5
Donavin Young	F	28	2-6	0-1	0-0	3	2	1	4	4
Aidan Cammann	F	12	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	2	0	0	2
Jeremy Dent-Smith	G	10	1-5	0-3	0-0	2	0	2	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

58.6Possessions58.6

109.2Offensive Efficiency107.5

107.5Defensive Efficiency109.2

1.7Net Efficiency-1.7

44.7%Effective FG%55.8%

45.5%True Shooting %57.4%

15.2%Turnover Rate17.3%

13.6%Free Throw Rate11.5%

25.8%3-Point Rate38.5%

1.00Assist / Turnover0.90

Game Summary

Pittsburgh won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 58.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in True Shooting %, Effective FG%, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.